I always thought this was more of a NWO brainchild top down control scheme. Why is Trump resurrecting it?
A National Real ID, as envisioned under the REAL ID Act, raises concerns about privacy, bureaucratic burdens, and potential for misuse. While proponents argue it enhances security, critics point to the risk of creating a centralized database accessible to various entities, increasing the likelihood of data breaches and identity theft. Additionally, the Act's implementation could lead to higher costs and administrative hassles for both states and individuals.
Here's a more detailed look at the potential implications: Privacy Concerns: Data Consolidation: REAL ID would create a national database of personal information, potentially making it easier for both government and private entities to track and access individuals' data. "Machine-Readable Zone": The act mandates unencrypted "machine-readable zones" on ID cards, allowing anyone with a barcode reader to skim personal information. Expanded Use Beyond Security: The Act's proponents claim it's for security, but there are concerns that REAL ID cards could be used for various purposes, potentially expanding government surveillance. Administrative and Economic Burdens: State Implementation Costs: States would face significant costs to redesign driver's licenses, update databases, and train personnel, with little federal funding support. Higher Fees and Hassles: Individuals could face higher fees and longer wait times at DMVs, as well as bureaucratic difficulties related to obtaining and using REAL ID cards. Increased Identity Theft Risk: The creation of a large, centralized database could make it an attractive target for identity thieves. Potential for Misuse: Surveillance Society: REAL ID could contribute to a surveillance society by facilitating routine tracking and monitoring of individuals. Private Sector Data Collection: Businesses could collect and sell data from REAL ID cards, potentially creating for-profit databases without the same privacy protections as government data. Weakened Security: While proponents claim improved security, critics argue that REAL ID could create vulnerabilities in the identification system and may not effectively deter criminals or terrorists. Other Considerations: Constitutional Concerns: Some argue that REAL ID infringes on states' rights and the principle of federalism. Lack of Benefit: Critics question whether REAL ID will actually enhance security or create unnecessary costs and burdens without a significant benefit. In conclusion, while proponents tout the potential for improved security, critics raise serious concerns about privacy, administrative burdens, and potential for misuse of the REAL ID system. The Act's implementation could have far-reaching consequences for individuals and state governments alike.
You guys do realize this isn't a "Trump thing" right? These were approved WAY back in 2005 by CONgress. They were supposed to go into effect years ago and the mandatory date kept sliding because states kept ignoring it.
Some of the takes on this I'm seeing here are crazy. Especially the ones where people say they will just use their passports to travel everywhere. Think about that for a minute. You don't want to give the govt the info needed to get a REAL-ID but you already gave it to them to get the passport (which has an RFID chip in it).
EVERY state is required to have a REAL-ID compliant driver license - it's not an opt-in thing - it's a federal law.
If you're worried about giving the govt info, they have had it since you were born and the birth certificate was issued. They have it if you ever got a passport. If you were in the military. If you ever signed up for any credit card/loan/mortgage or anything similar because it has been hacked and sold many times over. Hell - many of the older people on here probably had their social security numbers written everywhere, including many states that used the SSN as the driver license number.
I get the sentiment though. I hate giving my ID to anyone. I had to do a background investigation once to go do a pen-test for a certain stock/commodity exchange in the US, and tried everything to avoid giving them my SSN because I didn't trust that they would protect it and destroy it when my investigation passed. When I got onsite and started working (at night so the exchange was closed) I happened to find my paperwork on the floor in the area where everyone went to get their "doctor coats" they wore on the trading floor to look important. I found my whole team's info sitting on a table. I took all of it back to Texas with me and gave it to our VP so he could deal with it. I told him if he didn't, I would - and that meant someone would be sued. I know we got apologies and the guy at the exchange was fired, but I don't know if anything else was done.