Vance has "questionable" business and personal affiliations, has mentally unstable relatives/genes, has limited business and international diplomacy experience, AND has generally not yet sufficiently proved himself to be worthy or capable of such a daunting role.
Wow. I hope you are not the gatekeeper to Heaven. No one would get in. Rumor, relatives, and an insufficient track record? Not up to your snuff? No worse than Trump in 2016.
PDJT was - and is - VERY different. PDJT was 70 in 2016; had made and lost many, many $ millions; had created and run numerous businesses; had considerable international, life and "public figure" experience and had formed - and spoke about - his views of what was wrong with the country and how he would like to fix it decades before his 2016 run and win. In 2028, JDV will only be 44 and has a much "thinner" (and sketchier) resume - in ALL areas
Aside from that, THE WORLD/HUMANITY - not just the US - has been burned by "wolves in sheep's clothing" and by leaders who were not capable, not ready or not qualified SO often and in SO many ways, that logic DEMANDS caution. (Note that sayings like, "Better safe than sorry," and "Trust but verify," are popular because they are accurate.)
The frustrating reality is that FAR too often, when ANYONE does ANYTHING favorable for conservatives and/or SEEMS to be MAGA, FAR too many MAGA/conservatives/anons jump in head first to go all-in for them and to sing their praises as if they are the saviors of the world without adequately vetting them or "letting them show their true colors" by "giving them enough rope to hang themselves" (ex. Nikki Haley[?], Ron DeSantis[?], Mike Pence[?], Amy Comey Barrett[?] and John Roberrts[?]) OR proving themselves to be "the real deal" (something that JDV - IN TIME - might very well do).
And, a couple/few weeks ago, PDJT was asked by an interviewer if JDV was, in so many words, his heir apparent and he declined to answer in the affirmative, noting instead, that it was too early to say (and, IIRC, something to the effect that A LOT could happen between now and then).
So, when - in addition to prudent caution - PDJT won't endorse JDV OR ANYONE ELSE, it MIGHT be wise to withhold support for ANYONE for a while (~2+-3 years).
Vance has "questionable" business and personal affiliations, has mentally unstable relatives/genes, has limited business and international diplomacy experience, AND has generally not yet sufficiently proved himself to be worthy or capable of such a daunting role.
Wow. I hope you are not the gatekeeper to Heaven. No one would get in. Rumor, relatives, and an insufficient track record? Not up to your snuff? No worse than Trump in 2016.
PDJT was - and is - VERY different. PDJT was 70 in 2016; had made and lost many, many $ millions; had created and run numerous businesses; had considerable international, life and "public figure" experience and had formed - and spoke about - his views of what was wrong with the country and how he would like to fix it decades before his 2016 run and win. In 2028, JDV will only be 44 and has a much "thinner" (and sketchier) resume - in ALL areas
Aside from that, THE WORLD/HUMANITY - not just the US - has been burned by "wolves in sheep's clothing" and by leaders who were not capable, not ready or not qualified SO often and in SO many ways, that logic DEMANDS caution. (Note that sayings like, "Better safe than sorry," and "Trust but verify," are popular because they are accurate.)
The frustrating reality is that FAR too often, when ANYONE does ANYTHING favorable for conservatives and/or SEEMS to be MAGA, FAR too many MAGA/conservatives/anons jump in head first to go all-in for them and to sing their praises as if they are the saviors of the world without adequately vetting them or "letting them show their true colors" by "giving them enough rope to hang themselves" (ex. Nikki Haley[?], Ron DeSantis[?], Mike Pence[?], Amy Comey Barrett[?] and John Roberrts[?]) OR proving themselves to be "the real deal" (something that JDV - IN TIME - might very well do).
And, a couple/few weeks ago, PDJT was asked by an interviewer if JDV was, in so many words, his heir apparent and he declined to answer in the affirmative, noting instead, that it was too early to say (and, IIRC, something to the effect that A LOT could happen between now and then).
So, when - in addition to prudent caution - PDJT won't endorse JDV OR ANYONE ELSE, it MIGHT be wise to withhold support for ANYONE for a while (~2+-3 years).
There is no purpose in "supporting" anyone for the nomination until 2028.
100% agree!
Too much time, effort and resources are being spent on DISTRACTIONS and that don't - at this point - matter.