You can't simulate launch acceleration without a centrifuge (not involved) and you can't simulate weightlessness without a big airplane doing a porpoise dive (and only for 10s of seconds), having no view of Earth from above the atmosphere.
But, I will agree that "they" might not have known the difference anyway. Nevertheless, the view would have been impossible to fake.
Now when you are 100 km above the Earth. Special effects depend on the audience viewer having a fixed point of view.
This was the 11th manned flight. You are talking like it was all for the first time. And you have no idea how to create the image of a planet at that altitude of view. Special effects are engineered; they are not invoked by magic. It just kills me that people who don't know what they are talking about can confidently use the word "obviously."
What kind of "bimbo" is it who thinks it was fake, when it was real?
It is historic language usage that "man" is both a gender and non-gender. In the abstract, it has no gender, as with "mankind." It comports with the German use of "man" as "one." To refer to the gendered individual in German, one uses "mann." The formation of English from Archaic French and Anglo-Saxon involved the complete drop of gendered nouns.
And, besides, we have no verb such as "womanned." I thought the age of Woke was over with.
You can't simulate launch acceleration without a centrifuge (not involved) and you can't simulate weightlessness without a big airplane doing a porpoise dive (and only for 10s of seconds), having no view of Earth from above the atmosphere.
But, I will agree that "they" might not have known the difference anyway. Nevertheless, the view would have been impossible to fake.
Now when you are 100 km above the Earth. Special effects depend on the audience viewer having a fixed point of view.
This was the 11th manned flight. You are talking like it was all for the first time. And you have no idea how to create the image of a planet at that altitude of view. Special effects are engineered; they are not invoked by magic. It just kills me that people who don't know what they are talking about can confidently use the word "obviously."
What kind of "bimbo" is it who thinks it was fake, when it was real?
It is historic language usage that "man" is both a gender and non-gender. In the abstract, it has no gender, as with "mankind." It comports with the German use of "man" as "one." To refer to the gendered individual in German, one uses "mann." The formation of English from Archaic French and Anglo-Saxon involved the complete drop of gendered nouns.
And, besides, we have no verb such as "womanned." I thought the age of Woke was over with.