Strange. Nor do I have an X account or want one, but I was able to read the article that the link went to. Maybe try again?
The basic point was to use the judgements already made by the Supreme Court (e.g., the Chevron argument with the ATF) as a basis for summarily deleting all identifiable standing violations of their judgements appearing in agency regulations. Just getting it done without any further ado or legal minuet-dancing.
Oh, thanks, I did manage to see the details at Psiobs's threadreader link.
Maybe it's a browser issue. When I clicked on the X link in this thread's title, it took me to the initial post in the thread, which cuts off after "here's what you need to know..." And clicking on the photo just opened it in a bigger format, without any further text or links.
It’s a thread. It gives all the details.
Apparently not, if you're like me and don't have an X account or wish to log in and get one.
Strange. Nor do I have an X account or want one, but I was able to read the article that the link went to. Maybe try again?
The basic point was to use the judgements already made by the Supreme Court (e.g., the Chevron argument with the ATF) as a basis for summarily deleting all identifiable standing violations of their judgements appearing in agency regulations. Just getting it done without any further ado or legal minuet-dancing.
Oh, thanks, I did manage to see the details at Psiobs's threadreader link.
Maybe it's a browser issue. When I clicked on the X link in this thread's title, it took me to the initial post in the thread, which cuts off after "here's what you need to know..." And clicking on the photo just opened it in a bigger format, without any further text or links.