All you see is something launched up into the air and come back down. Everything else is the show. Of course something real is launched for the spacetards in physical attendance. Your response is the typical brainwashed response. They were faking space before CGI. it was analog space. I sat a mile from a shuttle launch. It is awe-inspiring. But it is just the launch. The power. The ground shaking. That does not equate to space walks and moon landings. If you ever watch, live, a real rocket launch from the Cape and viewed its trajectory you'd see. If you actually THINK about what is going on, you'd know. I remember many dozens of videos taken with rectilinear lenses such as the famous Chuck Yeager flight showing 100s if not 1000s of miles of flat horizon. They don't use rectilinear lenses anymore. Why?
All these rockets have gone where they were intended, delivering payloads and personnel. There was and is no fakery. You think something like the Space Shuttle can be launched for a fake mission? All that money, effort, and resources for the sake of....what? The space walks and Moon landings were real, involving real people, and real activities.
What exactly about a launch trajectory do you think is fake? I happen to be well acquainted with launch trajectories, and I think you are not.
What difference do rectilinear lenses make, when we have established the sphericity of the Earth through 400 years of direct land, sea, air, and space travel? Are you a Flat Earther? That is a banned topic, you know.
All you see is something launched up into the air and come back down. Everything else is the show. Of course something real is launched for the spacetards in physical attendance. Your response is the typical brainwashed response. They were faking space before CGI. it was analog space. I sat a mile from a shuttle launch. It is awe-inspiring. But it is just the launch. The power. The ground shaking. That does not equate to space walks and moon landings. If you ever watch, live, a real rocket launch from the Cape and viewed its trajectory you'd see. If you actually THINK about what is going on, you'd know. I remember many dozens of videos taken with rectilinear lenses such as the famous Chuck Yeager flight showing 100s if not 1000s of miles of flat horizon. They don't use rectilinear lenses anymore. Why?
All these rockets have gone where they were intended, delivering payloads and personnel. There was and is no fakery. You think something like the Space Shuttle can be launched for a fake mission? All that money, effort, and resources for the sake of....what? The space walks and Moon landings were real, involving real people, and real activities.
What exactly about a launch trajectory do you think is fake? I happen to be well acquainted with launch trajectories, and I think you are not.
What difference do rectilinear lenses make, when we have established the sphericity of the Earth through 400 years of direct land, sea, air, and space travel? Are you a Flat Earther? That is a banned topic, you know.