You are comparing it to people who don't have what Mike has, because you treat everyone as interchangeable, lefty communist. Each time you respond, you get more and more emotional. And then you asked me to make you a safe space. And now you go 'hurrrf two isn't a people and a half dozen means I'm right'.
I laid out the facts that informed my comparisons and you ignore them because I compared the bullshit you are spewing to a random statistic of my own, the gentleman who made nothing for decades. But you can't comprehend the difference between example and argument, even when I close it out with a non-sequitor.
That you keep this emotional tirade going by ignoring what I've said so you can mire yourself in uncertainty and doubt shows how dependent you are on feeling like you're correct.
Mike isn’t the only business owner in Minnesota. The FACT of the matter is $52k sustainable in Minnesota, no matter WHO you are. If he has to sacrifice some luxuries or assets because it’s above his current means, that may be the case - but it doesn’t mean it’s unsustainable to live on, as proven by the MAJORITY of the Minnesota population. You haven’t provided a single statistic and your virtue signaling sob story of a poor old man living on $10/hr or $20,800/yr, doesn’t hold any relevance - as it’s not even half the salary or the same state and COL nor does it even represent a substantial amount of people (the irony of talking about false equivalency). YOU are the one that even referenced people on this thread “pointing it out”, so by your own standards, it does matter that 6 other anons, on this thread, have said the same as I. You’re all over the place, clearly emotional in your blatant disregard and disdain for facts and statistics, not to mention the plain basis that you cannot DENY $52,000 is an unsustainable income, when it quite literally is the median income for that state. It’s very clear you’re a shill.
mmHmm. You are ignoring the other information I provided about living in the state and making it at median wages as well as the state of his finances and how it shakes out in comparison. All because you can't see past your emotional need to talk about an example of virtue signalling.
And, of course, you INSIST that because other people in different situations are handling it fine, he should, too. All based on the single statistic you have provided. No context, no clue about what it's like to live in MN on that wage or less, just that the median is 56k, therefore it's a-okay.
You are comparing it to people who don't have what Mike has, because you treat everyone as interchangeable, lefty communist. Each time you respond, you get more and more emotional. And then you asked me to make you a safe space. And now you go 'hurrrf two isn't a people and a half dozen means I'm right'.
I laid out the facts that informed my comparisons and you ignore them because I compared the bullshit you are spewing to a random statistic of my own, the gentleman who made nothing for decades. But you can't comprehend the difference between example and argument, even when I close it out with a non-sequitor.
That you keep this emotional tirade going by ignoring what I've said so you can mire yourself in uncertainty and doubt shows how dependent you are on feeling like you're correct.
Mike isn’t the only business owner in Minnesota. The FACT of the matter is $52k sustainable in Minnesota, no matter WHO you are. If he has to sacrifice some luxuries or assets because it’s above his current means, that may be the case - but it doesn’t mean it’s unsustainable to live on, as proven by the MAJORITY of the Minnesota population. You haven’t provided a single statistic and your virtue signaling sob story of a poor old man living on $10/hr or $20,800/yr, doesn’t hold any relevance - as it’s not even half the salary or the same state and COL nor does it even represent a substantial amount of people (the irony of talking about false equivalency). YOU are the one that even referenced people on this thread “pointing it out”, so by your own standards, it does matter that 6 other anons, on this thread, have said the same as I. You’re all over the place, clearly emotional in your blatant disregard and disdain for facts and statistics, not to mention the plain basis that you cannot DENY $52,000 is an unsustainable income, when it quite literally is the median income for that state. It’s very clear you’re a shill.
mmHmm. You are ignoring the other information I provided about living in the state and making it at median wages as well as the state of his finances and how it shakes out in comparison. All because you can't see past your emotional need to talk about an example of virtue signalling.
And, of course, you INSIST that because other people in different situations are handling it fine, he should, too. All based on the single statistic you have provided. No context, no clue about what it's like to live in MN on that wage or less, just that the median is 56k, therefore it's a-okay.
You need to let your communistic ideals go.