They're the same thing. Covid is a bioweapon - officially acknowledged this week. Fauci funded its creation and threatened to release it before it was unleashed. Meaning he didn't just idly suggest it would be used, he created it to use it and said so before doing so.
He is guilty of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and officially the government has acknowledged it.
Unfortunately, these blanket pardons don't actually say that. He can't just go ahead and pretend he was pardoned for war crimes. Trying to do that would just be admitting Biden was part of the war crimes and knew it.
Also: "Covid Crimes" are not crimes that can be pardoned. Nowhere in any federal code or law is "Covid Crimes" defined legally. And in a recent SCOTUS decision the Executive Branch was explicitly denied the ability to do anything by executive function that is not explicitly defined by Congress in law. (EPA vs W.VA) in order for this "pardon" to actually have any legal authority, the crimes it defines would have to exist. They do not. SCOTUS has already ruled on this so teh "pardon" has no teeth... but it would be best to hold that back until after compelling Fauci to testify against his partners in crime.
They're the same thing. Covid is a bioweapon - officially acknowledged this week. Fauci funded its creation and threatened to release it before it was unleashed. Meaning he didn't just idly suggest it would be used, he created it to use it and said so before doing so.
He is guilty of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and officially the government has acknowledged it.
Unfortunately, these blanket pardons don't actually say that. He can't just go ahead and pretend he was pardoned for war crimes. Trying to do that would just be admitting Biden was part of the war crimes and knew it.
Also: "Covid Crimes" are not crimes that can be pardoned. Nowhere in any federal code or law is "Covid Crimes" defined legally. And in a recent SCOTUS decision the Executive Branch was explicitly denied the ability to do anything by executive function that is not explicitly defined by Congress in law. (EPA vs W.VA) in order for this "pardon" to actually have any legal authority, the crimes it defines would have to exist. They do not. SCOTUS has already ruled on this so teh "pardon" has no teeth... but it would be best to hold that back until after compelling Fauci to testify against his partners in crime.