The point about “who are the actual, explicit companies doing this” is a good point. They’re going to have a technical term they call it by, that won’t be “chemtrails”. “Stratospheric Aerosol Injection”, maybe?
I did some quick searches. Found a few research program names, but no incorporated company publicly saying “it’s totally us doing this.”
Back when it first dropped that chemtrails were back on the menu here several months back (direct comment from cats, iirc), I think someone did find a few names. We should definitely have a list of explicit operators if so.
Yeah. That’s the sort of thing underlying my perception as well.
What I don’t have are specific operator names or methods. We should move past the high level abstract “conspiracy theory” reasonings for our claims and start getting some actuals.
It’d be good for a “ha! I’m right” claim of course, but much more importantly than ego boosts it would open up opportunity for class action lawsuits.
The point about “who are the actual, explicit companies doing this” is a good point. They’re going to have a technical term they call it by, that won’t be “chemtrails”. “Stratospheric Aerosol Injection”, maybe?
I did some quick searches. Found a few research program names, but no incorporated company publicly saying “it’s totally us doing this.”
Back when it first dropped that chemtrails were back on the menu here several months back (direct comment from cats, iirc), I think someone did find a few names. We should definitely have a list of explicit operators if so.
there's also this https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=9kdDkYfaNMQ
Yeah. That’s the sort of thing underlying my perception as well.
What I don’t have are specific operator names or methods. We should move past the high level abstract “conspiracy theory” reasonings for our claims and start getting some actuals.
It’d be good for a “ha! I’m right” claim of course, but much more importantly than ego boosts it would open up opportunity for class action lawsuits.
Can’t claim grievances without proof now, can we?