I made this comment to a post earlier today, but I thought it was worth its own post. I can't believe I had never looked this up before. Am I missing something? A jet engine is OPTIMIZED to burn jet fuel the most efficiently possible. Jet fuel burning in a building fire is NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO REACH THAT TEMPERATURE! (and even that would not melt steel!) This discrepancy, if as simple as it appears to be, should have been broadcast loud and far long ago. Perhaps this simple fact, if indeed as simple as it seems to be, so clearly indicates the official 9/11 narrative absolutely can't be true, is the reason it seems to have been buried all these years. Please correct me if this is not as simple as it seems.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (103)
sorted by:
Your theory, although plausible is near impossible in being probable. Sure fraud exists. But in the construction of a high rise like the WTC there are many layers of checks and balances that ensure the design of the structure is met. Many codes of construction are in place that drive the requirements of the material like IBC, AISC and AWS just a few for example. Also including multiple independent inspector and engineering verifications. I've performed 1000s of structural steel building Inspections and the inspector of record and structural inspector would not accept or be able to approve continuance of work due to the process involved that meets the code requirements for the materials.. they are physically tested and witnessed.. yeah the whole crew from contractor to sub contractors to design and structural engineers could be corrupt but on that scale and level and amount of people involved for permitting and acceptance on a structure that massive. No. Not possible.