I made this comment to a post earlier today, but I thought it was worth its own post. I can't believe I had never looked this up before. Am I missing something? A jet engine is OPTIMIZED to burn jet fuel the most efficiently possible. Jet fuel burning in a building fire is NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO REACH THAT TEMPERATURE! (and even that would not melt steel!) This discrepancy, if as simple as it appears to be, should have been broadcast loud and far long ago. Perhaps this simple fact, if indeed as simple as it seems to be, so clearly indicates the official 9/11 narrative absolutely can't be true, is the reason it seems to have been buried all these years. Please correct me if this is not as simple as it seems.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (103)
sorted by:
There is also the visible molten metal dripping down, seen in photos of the tower upright, and from the rubble, and firemen themselves saying how the heat was so Intense there was molten metal even days later, at the center of the rubble pile.
Firemen's videos are still out there for you to watch.
There was far more to the towers collapsing than just an airliner and it's fuel burning
If the molten metal was aluminum, that's all it would have taken. There is nothing about thermite that causes iron to remain molten for a long period of time. It is commonly used to weld railroad rails, and the resulting melt hardens up pretty fast.
I keep pointing out that no one considers that conditions were available for the airplane ALUMINUM to burn. And that is one hot fire. It is the active ingredient of thermite.