I made this comment to a post earlier today, but I thought it was worth its own post. I can't believe I had never looked this up before. Am I missing something? A jet engine is OPTIMIZED to burn jet fuel the most efficiently possible. Jet fuel burning in a building fire is NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO REACH THAT TEMPERATURE! (and even that would not melt steel!) This discrepancy, if as simple as it appears to be, should have been broadcast loud and far long ago. Perhaps this simple fact, if indeed as simple as it seems to be, so clearly indicates the official 9/11 narrative absolutely can't be true, is the reason it seems to have been buried all these years. Please correct me if this is not as simple as it seems.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (103)
sorted by:
I will look into it because I do not know the answer. What I do know is that the buildings in NYC are built into existing stratified bedrock which creates stability for a structure to prevent swaying due to a change of the center of mass. A change to the center of mass could be a result of a "fire". However as others have pointed out steel only begins melting at a much higher temperature and to fully transition from a solid state to a liquid state takes a lot of energy.
But with the way the buildings imploded something is rotten in Denmark.