"...criminal record, containing no improper use of a weapon, as well as the non-violent circumstances of his arrest do not support a finding that he poses a risk to public safety such that he cannot be trusted to use a weapon responsibly and should be deprived of his Second Amendment right to bear arms in self-defense..."
On the bright side, we now have precedent for unrestricted, no-license open and concealed carry without any restrictions. Assuming you don't have a violent record. Bravo.
"...criminal record, containing no improper use of a weapon, as well as the non-violent circumstances of his arrest do not support a finding that he poses a risk to public safety such that he cannot be trusted to use a weapon responsibly and should be deprived of his Second Amendment right to bear arms in self-defense..."
On the bright side, we now have precedent for unrestricted, no-license open and concealed carry without any restrictions. Assuming you don't have a violent record. Bravo.
I never thought THEY would stand up to defend the 2nd amendment. I'm so confused.