On Friday, Moderna got full FDA approval for limited use of their product (65+ or adults with one diagnosed condition that makes them vulnerable to COVID).
https://www.fda.gov/media/186545/download?attachment
Firstly, the assumption the FDA has back-doored here is highly potent: COVID is not harmful to the average person and has no need of a "vaccine".
Secondly, this is going to give FDA a comparable product. Yeah, they approved both, but if a statistically significant difference emerges in the adverse event reporting, they'll have an easier time pulling the bad-performing one since the vax heads will have their "safe" fallback product.
Now look at Pfizer's approval and supplemental approvals:
https://www.fda.gov/media/151710/download
https://www.fda.gov/media/181186/download?attachment
You'll see in that first BLA approval (first link) that Pfizer is required to perform additional studies due to the risk of their product. The studies have various interim reports but I notice the first one they cite ( “A Non-Interventional Post-Approval Safety Study of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine in the United States") "completes" on June 30th of this year.
So here we have setup the perfect foundation for a "scientifically sound" removal of the mRNA products, that preserves a bit of the ego of the scientific/medical communities while giving FDA goons procedural cover.
"Yeah we gave it emergency approval because it was a 'pandemic' but now that 'the science' has concluded, it's clear the risks outweigh the benefits, and we still have Novavax for those most at risk."
etc. etc. You get the idea. This fits in with Bobby's mantra of being data-driven and I think those that practice scientism will buy into it.
How does it bring back to life those that died from the mRNA vax or fix those who have permanent damage to their hearts, brains, nervous systems? The problem is they pushed a poison on people and demanded they take it with little to no science showing it to be safe. To the contrary, there was plenty of evidence from day 1 of the rollout that there was a serious problem that they refused to address. Heads need to roll and people like Anthony Fauci need to hang for their crimes.
interesting thought, though I wonder if putting nanoparticles together with spike proteins could be as effective as killing people as the Pfizer and Moderna shots
https://www.vax-before-travel.com/vaccines/novavax-covid-19-vaccine
Wow! Good catch, merf. I hope you're right about the plan to use this to REMOVE mRNA products -- all of them; many are IN DEVELOPMENT -- from the market.
RFK has been all about the data, and it pays to remember these products did roll out under Trump and he did claim to have taken them.
I have a feeling we'll all be a bit surprised. What if ultimately the shots are pretty much what is described in this Novavax approval? i.e. not worth it for the majority of the public, but potentially of some use if you are at risk?
And I'm just spit-balling here. Trying to reconcile my tiny personal data set with my Internet data set, with the official "facts", cross referenced with who controlled what when (between white hats/cabal)...