Ever hear the term Sampson option that Israel uses? Ever wonder why Q said we were saving Israel for last. In fact, Q made that statement 3 months before this missile launch.
Don't you realize the implication? The deduction is that the Sampson option would be launched from a group of Israeli SLBM.
First off, it wasn't Ketron Island where this missile was launched from, it was Whidbey Island, which is aprox 50 miles north of Bangor Washington and Hood Canal. Whidbey Island is aprox 20 miles east of the international border and Canadian waters.
Other articles say the missile was launched from near Whidbey Island and not necessarily the island itself which means it could have come from a sub sitting in open waters between Whidbey and Lopez Islands. There is a Naval Air Station on Whidbey Island, but they claimed they lack the capability to launch large ballistic missiles.
Feel free to research yourself, I added a few sites just in case you have trouble locating any on your own.
Your so called "expert information" is nothing but bullshit. So again, why are you deflecting attention away from the more probable theory and placing blame on our own military? Do you need me to include the definition of traitor here?
One thing at a time. The Israeli Dolphin submarines are capable of launching Popeye Turbo cruise missiles from its torpedo tubes. These are not rising missiles such as shown. And it remains true that the entrance to Puget Sound is very closely monitored against intrusion. All of our submarines must surface in order to navigate into the Sound. So, again, what Israeli submarine? They do not have SLBMs, nor the capability to launch a rocket vertically, and they would have been prevented from entry by the Navy, which I trust to do their job, and apparently you do not.
The Samson Option is a deterrent posture, to prevent attack on Israel. It is not a first-strike posture, for it could NEVER prevent a counterattack that would flatten Israel. So, the motivation is impossible. "Saving Israel for last" does not point to this at all; it is very open to interpretation. My interpretation is: "Only at the last will it be possible to assure that Israel and all its people will live in peace and harmony with its neighbors."
My father and brother were navy men, my father in the submarine service, so I am not disparaging the Navy. It is regrettable that some espionage agents were found in the Navy over the past half-century, so they are always a possibility. Thus, a rogue pair of agents in one submarine might have launched a missile before they were taken down. Or do you think that every OTHER government agency is clearly corrupted, but the armed forces are impervious to corruption? I introduce General Milley...
My recollection is that the image was taken from Ketron Island (not where the missile was launched from). Bangor is in the generally north direction, closer than Whidbey Island. There are SSBN boats there; I've been in one. And I live here, so I know all about the geography.
I get my information from being here and looking at the map, not reading newspaper accounts. I also rule out obvious impossibilities, like a sneaking Israeli sub.
There you go again, deflecting (running cover), placing blame on our own Navy.
What Israeli sub? Any of the 6 that Germany sold them prior to 2012. Dolphin Class subs that are nuclear capable.
https://www.defencetalk.com/germany-confirms-sale-of-nuclear-capable-sub-to-israel-41034/
Ever hear the term Sampson option that Israel uses? Ever wonder why Q said we were saving Israel for last. In fact, Q made that statement 3 months before this missile launch.
u/#q916
Don't you realize the implication? The deduction is that the Sampson option would be launched from a group of Israeli SLBM.
First off, it wasn't Ketron Island where this missile was launched from, it was Whidbey Island, which is aprox 50 miles north of Bangor Washington and Hood Canal. Whidbey Island is aprox 20 miles east of the international border and Canadian waters.
Other articles say the missile was launched from near Whidbey Island and not necessarily the island itself which means it could have come from a sub sitting in open waters between Whidbey and Lopez Islands. There is a Naval Air Station on Whidbey Island, but they claimed they lack the capability to launch large ballistic missiles.
Feel free to research yourself, I added a few sites just in case you have trouble locating any on your own.
https://flyingcuttlefish.wordpress.com/2018/06/13/missile/
https://cliffmass.blogspot.com/2018/06/was-there-unannounced-missile-launch-on.html
https://solarismodalis.com/some-areas-we-cannot-expand-on-the-whidbey-island-missile-incident/
Your so called "expert information" is nothing but bullshit. So again, why are you deflecting attention away from the more probable theory and placing blame on our own military? Do you need me to include the definition of traitor here?
One thing at a time. The Israeli Dolphin submarines are capable of launching Popeye Turbo cruise missiles from its torpedo tubes. These are not rising missiles such as shown. And it remains true that the entrance to Puget Sound is very closely monitored against intrusion. All of our submarines must surface in order to navigate into the Sound. So, again, what Israeli submarine? They do not have SLBMs, nor the capability to launch a rocket vertically, and they would have been prevented from entry by the Navy, which I trust to do their job, and apparently you do not.
The Samson Option is a deterrent posture, to prevent attack on Israel. It is not a first-strike posture, for it could NEVER prevent a counterattack that would flatten Israel. So, the motivation is impossible. "Saving Israel for last" does not point to this at all; it is very open to interpretation. My interpretation is: "Only at the last will it be possible to assure that Israel and all its people will live in peace and harmony with its neighbors."
My father and brother were navy men, my father in the submarine service, so I am not disparaging the Navy. It is regrettable that some espionage agents were found in the Navy over the past half-century, so they are always a possibility. Thus, a rogue pair of agents in one submarine might have launched a missile before they were taken down. Or do you think that every OTHER government agency is clearly corrupted, but the armed forces are impervious to corruption? I introduce General Milley...
My recollection is that the image was taken from Ketron Island (not where the missile was launched from). Bangor is in the generally north direction, closer than Whidbey Island. There are SSBN boats there; I've been in one. And I live here, so I know all about the geography.
I get my information from being here and looking at the map, not reading newspaper accounts. I also rule out obvious impossibilities, like a sneaking Israeli sub.