I don't think there's any guidance system anywhere that's not using Quaternions. That's 4D thinking right there. Get used to it. 😀
(Just don't ask me to do 5D. I have to pretend to understand the 4D stuff)
What the heck are you doing here if you can't even entertain the mere possibility of a conspiracy? You can't possibly hope to put all this crazy back in the box.
I know of quaternions, but mathematics is not physics, a point that seems to elude you. You may be in tune with many theoretical physicists who have gotten lost in the idea that mathematics is reality (e.g., string theory). The simple 4D stuff is 3 dimensions in space and one in time...but there is no "spacetime." Being able to plot relationships does not establish that time is a physical continuum.
I don't bother to entertain "mere" possibilities. They need to be motivated by legitimate evidence, not just a desire to construct them. Nuclear fusion (ITER) is misrepresented as being "clean" energy. CERN is chasing a vain pursuit. Ever higher energies => ever more particles. Does no one realize that they are only multiplying questions and not answering any? It doesn't help their case when they claim to have created the "God particle."
What "crazy" back in what "box"? I don't decode slang very well. (It may be as simple as shutting off the money, but I really need to know what you are referring to.)
Yes, math is a tool to describe the physics. Both math and physics appear corrupted to me (like everything else) and seem to be off in the weeds.
We've reached the limits of GAW where it's too hard to backtrack the thread and see what kinda crazy I was talking about. I think I was using a metaphor. The CIowns conflate conspiracy theory with crazy. Like if I said maybe many of the BOEing issues were actually contrived to carry messages in metadata about the battle for the Bank Of England. The CIowns would All say "nonsense! That's crazy person talk". But in reality the "crazy" is just forbidden ideas that can't be allowed. This place pretends to accommodate, but there are gatekeepers, such as yourself.
Meanwhile, I need to review and decide what I think about the "god particle". I'll start with the "crazy"...
Boeing carries no messages. Especially messages whose public meaning is "WE HAVE FUCKED UP BIGTIME!" It has a hard enough time managing a workforce.
I'm a "gatekeeper"? That's quite a promotion. All I try to be is a voice of reason.
Whether or not there is a God particle or whatever it is (Higgs boson), makes no difference outside of CERN's conference rooms. They are acutely vulnerable to "What have you done for me lately?" and dream up the most shrill self-promotion.
I don't think there's any guidance system anywhere that's not using Quaternions. That's 4D thinking right there. Get used to it. 😀
(Just don't ask me to do 5D. I have to pretend to understand the 4D stuff)
What the heck are you doing here if you can't even entertain the mere possibility of a conspiracy? You can't possibly hope to put all this crazy back in the box.
I know of quaternions, but mathematics is not physics, a point that seems to elude you. You may be in tune with many theoretical physicists who have gotten lost in the idea that mathematics is reality (e.g., string theory). The simple 4D stuff is 3 dimensions in space and one in time...but there is no "spacetime." Being able to plot relationships does not establish that time is a physical continuum.
I don't bother to entertain "mere" possibilities. They need to be motivated by legitimate evidence, not just a desire to construct them. Nuclear fusion (ITER) is misrepresented as being "clean" energy. CERN is chasing a vain pursuit. Ever higher energies => ever more particles. Does no one realize that they are only multiplying questions and not answering any? It doesn't help their case when they claim to have created the "God particle."
What "crazy" back in what "box"? I don't decode slang very well. (It may be as simple as shutting off the money, but I really need to know what you are referring to.)
Yes, math is a tool to describe the physics. Both math and physics appear corrupted to me (like everything else) and seem to be off in the weeds.
We've reached the limits of GAW where it's too hard to backtrack the thread and see what kinda crazy I was talking about. I think I was using a metaphor. The CIowns conflate conspiracy theory with crazy. Like if I said maybe many of the BOEing issues were actually contrived to carry messages in metadata about the battle for the Bank Of England. The CIowns would All say "nonsense! That's crazy person talk". But in reality the "crazy" is just forbidden ideas that can't be allowed. This place pretends to accommodate, but there are gatekeepers, such as yourself.
Meanwhile, I need to review and decide what I think about the "god particle". I'll start with the "crazy"...
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/06/29/cern-nuclear-research/
Boeing carries no messages. Especially messages whose public meaning is "WE HAVE FUCKED UP BIGTIME!" It has a hard enough time managing a workforce.
I'm a "gatekeeper"? That's quite a promotion. All I try to be is a voice of reason.
Whether or not there is a God particle or whatever it is (Higgs boson), makes no difference outside of CERN's conference rooms. They are acutely vulnerable to "What have you done for me lately?" and dream up the most shrill self-promotion.
It's a slippery slope. You start out as a mere "voice of reason" and the next thing ya know yer the gatekeeper. Congrats on the promotion.