These AI image detectors even detect many filters and other nominal enhancements as AI. I had very old photographs fromm 30-40 years ago detected ass AI.
It's best to take these AI detectors as a starting point. By scanning just sections of a photo, I've been able to pinpoint where manipulation has occurred. It's just another tool in the toolbox to help assess things. You have to evaluate all of the data as a whole to come to any conclusions.
screenshotting a single image from a video, and expecting a shitty "ai detector" is a futile attempt. And probably pointless.
Unless you have an AI video detector (which in itself wont be accurate), a screenshot ain't gunna work.
Take a screenshot from ANY other twitter video and run it through it, you'll probably get the same results.
I took a screenshot of the tank, cropped it down to just the photo (no logo), then ran it through https://aiimagedetector.org.
The results:
Human: 30.21
AI: 69.79
Moderately Likely Created By AI
These AI image detectors even detect many filters and other nominal enhancements as AI. I had very old photographs fromm 30-40 years ago detected ass AI.
<cough>
"The Terminator" was released 3-40 years ago.
<cough, cough>
No, this was a family photo. And no, I am not related to the Terminator!
It's best to take these AI detectors as a starting point. By scanning just sections of a photo, I've been able to pinpoint where manipulation has occurred. It's just another tool in the toolbox to help assess things. You have to evaluate all of the data as a whole to come to any conclusions.
screenshotting a single image from a video, and expecting a shitty "ai detector" is a futile attempt. And probably pointless.
Unless you have an AI video detector (which in itself wont be accurate), a screenshot ain't gunna work. Take a screenshot from ANY other twitter video and run it through it, you'll probably get the same results.