Here's an article which cites Tucker's position and sentiments from three days ago:
And here was Trump's reply (w/o having read the article, to be fair) from just a bit ago:
https://x.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1934733902620323913
Really? There's no room for spirited, intelligent debate?
I'm this close to telling my favorite president of all time to POUND SAND.
Intelligent, spirited debate isn't what Trump does. If someone publicly goes against any of his decisions, he usually goes off on them in a quite juvenile way. Regardless of what We, The People say, the current Iranian regime is about to come to an end, probably in a violent way.
And IF the reports of Khameini's death are accurate, whoever takes over after him is probably going to retaliate in a stupid manner, and this will continue on (while the innocent Iranians suffer) until the U.S./Israel are able to find a puppet to install.
This has happened again and again in the M.E. since th Clowns got Congressionallu chartered in '47. I don't think it's a coincidence that the Clowns and Israel were both created within months of each other. It's like th political version of birthig fraternal twins.
That's not true. I've heard countless anecdotes since his first administration of those working closely with the president, citing that he will listen for a long time to the various voices in the room - which, of course, disagree much of the time - before reaching a decision.
My biggest problem is that there's no spirited debate happening publicly. MTG is virtually the only person in Congress to ask, Do we really have to?
And for those of who are old enough, this gaslighting smells like it was ripped out of the same CIA playbook used to sell us the War in Iraq over twenty years ago.