I tend to fall on the side of Nuclear Weapons are comms for Nation Destroying Info...
But seriously, all the stuff I asked in the title, I haven't seen vids yet & am wondering if any normies will ask the same questions too, or if there is a rational explanation why there isn't nuclear fallout (assuming there isn't, or it isn't made a big deal)?
Bunker busters take out a target and fill in the hole with the rubble. Stockpiles of enriched uranium or even assembled nuclear weapons would not be detonated, just buried under 90 meters of rubble.
We had nuke sniffers flying around the upper central US sniffing for radiation in the jet stream last week because the nuclear power plants Israel hit 8 days ago have a higher likelihood of atmospheric radiation release than physically destroying a stockpile of Uranium or a nuclear weapon sitting in a bunker.
Iran already said ahead of attack hat all the enriched material was move elsewhere.
Do you happen to have a source on that? This could get interesting.
Proof?
It's been 18 hours and you haven't answered the last guy asking where you pulled that "info" from
Sorry for delay, been out of country without computer access.
Try this: 2:27 mark.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nVt8p7DAcBQ&t=4s
Thank you, with the discussions of newer weapons this makes sense.