https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114734424268466099
"Iran has officially responded to our Obliteration of their Nuclear Facilities with a very weak response, which we expected, and have very effectively countered. There have been 14 missiles fired — 13 were knocked down, and 1 was “set free,” because it was headed in a nonthreatening direction. I am pleased to report that NO Americans were harmed, and hardly any damage was done. Most importantly, they’ve gotten it all out of their “system,” and there will, hopefully, be no further HATE. I want to thank Iran for giving us early notice, which made it possible for no lives to be lost, and nobody to be injured. Perhaps Iran can now proceed to Peace and Harmony in the Region, and I will enthusiastically encourage Israel to do the same. Thank you for your attention to this matter!
DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA"
Ah yes, but let me guess, trying to get peace in the middle east is doing Israels bidding right?
If you follow the CIA's history, propping up violent regimes is their modus operandi. Fact of the matter the Ayatollahs funding of these terrorists groups allowed the military industrial complex to keep the perpetual war going in the middle east.
When you follow the fact pattern the only reason I can surmise from:
The American military leaving equipment and vehicles behind any time they withdraw from an area, munitions and supplies left for the terrorist groups.
Obama giving a pallet of cash directly to Iran.
Osama hiding out in the "close" ally Pakistan's backyard. Not to mention the hot bed of terrorism that is Pakistan itself.
There's probably more such actions others have found, but it seems to me that there really is a shady cabal of people who are propping up the Ayatollah regime.
Fact of the matter is the US has always had the capability to take down the Iranian regime. But the military industrial complex needs wars to happen.
Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq? It was not about winning at all.
An argument based on supposition is not argument; it is just a restatement of an unjustified belief.
Tacking on convenient coincidences also does not further an argument. This includes an Iran-friendly Obama administration (likely he was/is a sympathetic Muslim) and a Biden administration that was guided by workers behind the scenes. Iran can have allies without being governed by puppets, which was the original claim.
Having worked in the military-industrial complex for 40 years, I seriously doubt the canard that it needs these mini-wars in order to stay in business. Bombs and ammunition are not big ticket product lines, and do not engage the full technical capabilities of the major vendors.
"Tacking on convenient coincidences also does not further an argument."
How many coincidences before it becomes mathematically impossible? The more coincidences the more it smells like bullshit.
You spent 40 years in the military industrial complex yet you can't grasp the fact American military has been embroiled in a perpetual conflict since WW2, they aren't mini wars at all, just one long perpetual conflict, American troops have been fighting in Afghanistan longer than WW2 was fought for.
Mini wars my arse, there hasn't been a moment the military industrial complex hasn't been engaged in spending vast amounts of American tax money, most of which don't bring any benefit to the US. There is a reason why the Pentagon can't pass an audit.
And another thing, you completely ignored what Tsearch was talking about, he never said the cabal had direct control of Iran, he even said that he believes the Iranian regime is complicit in aiding the Cabal. Two seperate entities, with Iran being propped up by the Cabal.
If your on a Q board trying to argue that a shadowy cabal of people haven't been manipulating world events, then I suggest you go read a few Q drops.
There is a big picture here about the nature of the beast we are fighting, it's the classic good vs evil. Well may the Military industrial complex not need perpetual war to survive, but that's not how it's conducting itself.
The swamp is deep, but it seems you don't think the swamp exists, or even how it would work?
Do you trust the CIA? Do you see what their track record on regime change is?
It's not far fetched for me to follow the fact patterns and come up with the conclusion that propping up Iran is exactly something in the deepstate playbook.
No amount of coincidences is impossible. There is no such thing as "mathematically impossible." You guys constantly confuse probability with certainty.
Yes, 40 more years than you, and the example that does not fit your premise is nuclear weapons. We have not used nuclear weapons for 80 years, but we have built plenty of weapon systems for and against their use. A war policy will necessarily involve weapons procurement. I doubt you can establish that the procurements from these brush wars are enough to fund the defense industry as a whole, or motivate the big ticket programs. A brush war is not sufficient to prompt the development of a B-2 bomber. Or an F-22. Or an F-35. Or an F-47.
The Pentagon not being able to pass an audit is a problem at a higher level than procurement, which I know from experience is conducted with exacting accounting standards. Operations consumes by far the larger quantity of budget.
You are just proclaiming assertions without any evidence to make them stick. If you had numbers to cite, you would cite and source them. But you don't.
The issue was if a "cabal" had "puppet" control over the government of Iran. Now you want to say "well, it wasn't 'direct' control." How do you have indirect puppets? This is nothing more than a retreat from an untenable position, to a position that is pure murk.
As far as I know, the reach of "the cabal" is limited to the Western world. Saying that it is worldwide without borders is a big claim, not established by evidence. You are trying to claim more than Q claims.
And you don't have any evidence that the military industry (I will leave the armed services out of this) is conducting itself in an evil way. Plenty of evidence for the specific occasions of folly, bad judgement, or stupidity, but no worse than any other industry for "evil." Financial shenanigans are rare and severely reprimanded when they are uncovered.
I have believed the swamp exists probably longer than you have been alive, so tuck that one in your back pocket. It is useless against me. The difference is that I know what I am talking about.
Do I defend the CIA? I don't and I haven't. Why do you insinuate that I would or did? This is part of your Package Deal mentality: if I don't agree with one part of your dogma, I must therefore oppose all of it.
Helping Iran as a useful mad dog? Yes. Having puppet control? No. (It is in the nature of mad dogs that they cannot be controlled. You are left with the options of feeding it so it can predate, or starving it so it cannot.)
"The issue was if a "cabal" had "puppet" control over the government of Iran. Now you want to say "well, it wasn't 'direct' control." How do you have indirect puppets? This is nothing more than a retreat from an untenable position, to a position that is pure murk."
When did I retreat? I never claimed direct control, neither did Tsearch. I haven't even defined how I believe that Iran is propped up by the Cabal.
Tsearch said they were puppets of the cabal, which you can argue rightly so, that the term 'puppet' is semantically the incorrect term to define the exact mechanism of control that the cabal has in Iran. Yes it's more akin to feeding the mad dog, but it most definitely is allowed to be the mad dog because the cabal has stopped anyone from actually solving the Iran problem.(Why is Trump able to clean up a whole bunch of Iran's top military people in strikes, yet Biden and Obama or Bush couldn't do it? Simple they didn't want to)
And I refute your assertion that the cabals reach is only in the west, your completely ignoring the reach of the CIA and Mossad, both of which have been heavily controlled and used by the Cabal to ferment all sorts of bullshit terrorism cells. The Taliban and Isis were absolutely allowed to thrive because they were allowed to, you think all that money and equipment came from Iran only? That's also ignoring the amount of effort the American military under Obama and Biden did to arm the terrorist via direct donations in equipment. (Remember Trump calling a general an idiot because the general said it was cheaper to leave the equipment behind.
And as for: "You are just proclaiming assertions without any evidence to make them stick. If you had numbers to cite, you would cite and source them. But you don't."
I'll give you a source 'War is a racket' written by Major General Smedley Butler.
Same shit different day, but don't think I'm talking out of my arse about the military industrial complex, I'm not in an isolated bubble of personal beliefs.