“Mercury Has FINALLY Been Taken Out Of All Childhood Vaccines, This Has Been A 30 Year Battle”
(twitter.com)
💪 MAHA! 🌱
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (67)
sorted by:
I understand all of what you stated and I do not disagree. That would be the ideal outcome for this battle. However, I was speaking more in terms of where things stand at this moment and what can be realistically accomplished given where things are currently situated. Turning the ship around into a new understanding about disease and the science that needs to establish that new way of thinking does not come quickly and will take time. But we need to start somewhere. It will be a process to remove the current structure one brick at a time until the wall falls. Things are starting to shift and at least some are willing to reevaluate things they just assumed were true and a given. This is my wheelhouse and I do see progress - albeit slow.
Thank you for your response so that others can read it. Some may be new to the discussion.
Well I agree with you on one hand, and on the other not so much. I've watched the "no virus camp" work overtime for 5 years now to breakthrough with the holdouts - RFK Jr. Del Bigtree, Children's Defense Fund, Dr. McCullough, Dr. Mercola, Judy Mykovits, Sherry Tenpenny, Suzanne Humpries, Dr. Robert Malone and dozens of others. They aren't budging. None are even willing to have an open forum discussion.
In short, they've had more than enough time to either; A. Formulate a response or defense of the germ model to the accusations leveled. B. Come around to recognizing the hard truth.
But they've all done neither. Why? They're all afraid to admit they've been wrong all these years. I get it. Extreme cognitive dissonance. Can't feel good to even approach that event horizon.
Thus, I've come to the conclusion that the only way forward is the DIRECT PATH. A figurative punch in the nose is what's needed. Their position has to be treated with some degree of disdain. They need to actually feel worse about not addressing the elephant in the room than they do about sticking with the germ model. Until this happens, they're going to stick with their outdated position.
It's groups like these that will turn the tide. Forget about big government, AMA, NIH, CDC, etc. They'll be the very last to come around.
So until then, hundreds of millions of children will continue to needlessly receive these absolutely useless jabs and suffer zillions of conflict shocks because of them. And for the record, it is these conflict shocks that cause autism. It's not the jab ingredients that do it. It's a combination conflict shock of fear and anger trauma culminating the brain shutting down those centers to protect the child that doesn't understand its insane doctor and mother and has no other protector to turn to.
I too tried for several years to take the "gentle approach". It never worked with anybody. They had the same general attitude -> "I'll stick with the establishment".
Knowing this, you can see how slowly the tides will turn. If the default position is to stick with the establishment and the establishment will be the very last to come around, nothing is ever going to change.
This is how it's going for the past 5 years with no change in sight and this is how it will continue to go if we dismiss the health and well-being of children around the world for the sake of brainwashed adults hurt feelings. It's not even a hard choice.
We have to proclaim it loudly and proudly every chance we get. I've put together several podcasts on the topic with several new "cartoons" on the way shortly.
And FWIW, everybody I'm close to that has younger kids is on board now. I've forced them to listen to me, sometimes almost against their wills. I've talked to dozens of their pediatricians too. While I haven't turned any of them around to the truth, all were completely unable to defend germ theory or counter my assertions. Which, of course, turned the parents away from more jabs for their kids.
I have turned 3.5 out of maybe 50 physicians. Two were ER doctors. One was retired. And the one that's a "half" is still practicing. We had several phone calls, exchanged dozens of emails over the course of a year or so. I'm pretty sure he ran out of questions after I responded to his last email and had nothing left to offer in defense of boogeyman-viruses. He stopped responding to me. So at a minimum, I know he's highly doubtful of what he was taught (brainwashed into) in medical school.
Lastly, I don't know if you're aware but RFK Jr. has been approached dozens of times to have a discussion with the folks in the "no virus camp". His response? "I don't have time". The same goes for Del Bigtree, Sherry Tenpenny, Suzanne Humphries. Dr. Malone and the administrators at "Children's Defense Fund". All have been approached dozens of times, simply to have an open forum discussion. All have declined with zero salient reasons given as to why.
So ask yourself, why would all these people refuse to defend the totally defunct "germ theory". Perhaps it's because they know they can't?
That's been my experience when it comes to "controversial subjects", where there's no "controversy" left in truth. They're happy to fight and argue if they have solid footing for holding their position. But when they know they'll be knocked off their perch, they run away and hide instead.
Food for thought. And I'm not bonking you over the head with this. I appreciate your knowledge and acknowledging what I had to say. It's just that, you're the exact type of person we need on the front lines with us.
I'm happy to provide you unlimited education and answer any questions you might still have about "germs". The entire model is a fraud. Bacteria, fungi and parasites do exist, but they don't "cause dis-ease". That's a half-truth. They are all generated by your body when needed to repair, restore or remove tissue or toxic waste. That you "feel sick" while they are active is the reason for the confusion. There's zero scientific evidence that we "catch" any of these things however. The science demonstrates the exact opposite in fact...that we DON'T CATCH GERMS from "out there".
Anyway, thanks for responding. I hope you consider what I had to say. What's most important? Slow-boiling the frog a degree per year to ease the brainwashed adults into the truth at the expense of the children? Or flash-boiling the frog to save the kids from untold difficulties?
Thank you for your response. I agree with all you said and I appreciate you being on the front line of this battle. I am now retired, but fought my own battles when within the system. Mostly the fight was against vaxxines and the overuse of pharma. But being just a GP my voice didn't carry much weight beyond my own sphere of influence. I was already kept at arms length because of my positions. I did have a unique situation because many in my patient base were off grid individuals and their families - grew their own food, homeschooled, and no jabs. I was able to compare the health of my off grid patients to those that were more mainstream and the difference was not even close. Not one child in the off grid cohort had allergies, skin issues, gut problems, or developmental disorders. One of the most frustrating things for me was not only educating other clinicians, but also patients. People are too comfortable with established narratives and simply don't like to be challenged - especially if that challenge forces them to make decisions they are not going to be comfortable with.
I also agree that the list of people you mentioned have come a certain distance, but not as far as they should. You are also right in that changing a paradigm that has been well established is something they do not want to be faced with. They have built careers and reputations on the faulty paradigm. But, I do appreciate what they have done so far. They risked a great deal by standing where they are. Like I already said, we have to start somewhere and something is better than nothing when it comes to saving kids.
I think if we can open up funding for independent research that looks critically at some of these issues possibly we can get to the finish line and shift those paradigms. It has to start there and break the strangle hold on the data and research. Part of the problem with changing the minds of the professionals that filters down to regular people is the lack of research - mostly because of the money and special interests being the gatekeepers. I worked in research for awhile and the politics of it all was very frustrating. They don't do science for science's sake. It is all about clout, control, and money. Until we can get beyond good arguments that make sense and actually deliver on the goods, it will be difficult. However, I have seen a shift in that some are starting to entertain the alternatives and think about it. That is a huge move from where people were a few years ago.
I am grateful that we have people like you with a voice getting the topic out there for others to consider. That also is a far cry from where things were a few years back. Thank you.
Kudos to you for all you're doing and have done. I wish you much luck in your continued efforts!