Replication is a key part of proving a hypothesis. You are being so dense.
One study and you’re done? Are you serious? You don’t think it’s a good idea for other scientists to conduct the same experiment you did in different settings to see if the outcome is the same? You’ve actually got me laughing at how stupid you are being.
Again, I asked for proof, not for a bunch of citations for me to go dig through myself. I could have made the same 30 second search and got the same results as you.
You’re laughing, I’m laughing too, as you don’t seem to understand what “proof” means. Plenty of fools laugh at others as if the other is the fool.
I don’t need a bunch of people repeating the same crap, and as the person making the positive claim, you still haven’t answered my request,
Proof in science isn’t absolute but a high degree of confidence based on converging evidence. For sun exposure and skin cancer, this threshold is met by decades of robust data.
Replication is a key part of proving a hypothesis. You are being so dense.
One study and you’re done? Are you serious? You don’t think it’s a good idea for other scientists to conduct the same experiment you did in different settings to see if the outcome is the same? You’ve actually got me laughing at how stupid you are being.
Nice deflection.
Again, I asked for proof, not for a bunch of citations for me to go dig through myself. I could have made the same 30 second search and got the same results as you.
You’re laughing, I’m laughing too, as you don’t seem to understand what “proof” means. Plenty of fools laugh at others as if the other is the fool.
I don’t need a bunch of people repeating the same crap, and as the person making the positive claim, you still haven’t answered my request,
You’re the one deflecting.
Proof in science isn’t absolute but a high degree of confidence based on converging evidence. For sun exposure and skin cancer, this threshold is met by decades of robust data.
All hail The Science™!!
No, all look at the data. You got this big boy.