Replication is a key part of proving a hypothesis. You are being so dense.
One study and you’re done? Are you serious? You don’t think it’s a good idea for other scientists to conduct the same experiment you did in different settings to see if the outcome is the same? You’ve actually got me laughing at how stupid you are being.
Below is a list of studies and authoritative sources that establish a link between sun exposure (specifically ultraviolet (UV) radiation) and skin cancer. These studies provide evidence through epidemiological data, experimental research, and reviews of UV radiation’s role in causing skin cancers, including melanoma, basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Each entry includes a brief description of the study’s findings and, where possible, a direct link or citation to access the study. All sources are drawn from the provided web results or are well-established references in the field.
Studies Linking Sun Exposure to Skin Cancer
- Armstrong BK, Kricker A. (2001). “The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer.” Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B, 63(1-3):8-18. DOI: 10.1016/s1011-1344(01)00198-1. • Description: This review compiles epidemiological evidence showing that UV radiation from the sun is a primary cause of skin cancer, including melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers (BCC and SCC). It discusses how UV exposure leads to DNA damage, which can initiate carcinogenesis, and highlights higher skin cancer incidence in regions with greater UV exposure (e.g., Australia). • Link: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1011-1344(01)00198-1 • Citation:
- Kricker A, Armstrong BK, English DR, Heenan PJ. (1995). “A dose-response curve for sun exposure and basal cell carcinoma.” International Journal of Cancer, 60(4):482-488. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910600410. • Description: This case-control study demonstrates a dose-response relationship between sun exposure and basal cell carcinoma, showing that higher cumulative UV exposure increases BCC risk. It provides direct evidence linking sun exposure to non-melanoma skin cancer. • Link: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2910600410 • Citation:
- English DR, Armstrong BK, Kricker A, Winter MG, Heenan PJ, Randell PL. (1998). “Case-control study of sun exposure and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.” International Journal of Cancer, 77(3):347-353. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980729)77:3<347::AID-IJC4>3.0.CO;2-O. • Description: This study finds that chronic sun exposure, particularly occupational exposure, significantly increases the risk of squamous cell carcinoma. It emphasizes the role of cumulative UV exposure in SCC development. • Link: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19980729)77:3<347::AID-IJC4>3.0.CO;2-O • Citation:
- Gallagher RP, Hill GB, Bajdik CD, et al. (1995). “Sunlight exposure, pigmentary factors, and risk of nonmelanocytic skin cancer. I. Basal cell carcinoma.” Archives of Dermatology, 131(2):157-163. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1995.01690140039006. • Description: This study links recreational and occupational sun exposure to an increased risk of basal cell carcinoma, particularly in individuals with sun-sensitive skin. It provides evidence of UV radiation’s role in BCC through detailed exposure assessments. • Link: https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1995.01690140039006 • Citation:
- Holman CD, Armstrong BK. (1984). “Cutaneous malignant melanoma and indicators of total accumulated exposure to the sun: an analysis separating histogenetic types.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 73(1):75-82. PMID: 6588215. • Description: This study establishes a connection between total accumulated sun exposure and cutaneous malignant melanoma, showing that UV exposure contributes to melanoma risk across different histogenetic types. • Link: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6588215/ • Citation:
- Whiteman DC, Whiteman CA, Green AC. (2001). “Childhood sun exposure as a risk factor for melanoma: a systematic review of epidemiologic studies.” Cancer Causes & Control, 12(1):69-82. DOI: 10.1023/A:1008980919848. • Description: This systematic review finds that childhood sun exposure, particularly severe sunburns, significantly increases the risk of melanoma later in life. It underscores the long-term impact of early UV exposure. • Link: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008980919848 • Citation:
- Gilchrest BA, Eller MS, Geller AC, Yaar M. (1999). “The pathogenesis of melanoma induced by ultraviolet radiation.” New England Journal of Medicine, 340(17):1341-1348. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199904293401707. • Description: This article explains the biological mechanisms by which UV radiation induces melanoma, focusing on DNA damage and mutations in genes like p53. It provides a detailed look at how UV exposure initiates carcinogenesis. • Link: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199904293401707 • Citation:
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (2012). “Radiation: Volume 100D – A Review of Human Carcinogens.” • Description: This IARC monograph concludes that solar UV radiation is a proven human carcinogen, causing cutaneous malignant melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers. It synthesizes evidence from numerous studies showing that UV exposure from the sun damages DNA, leading to skin cancer. • Link: https://publications.iarc.fr/123 • Citation:
- Strickland PT, Vitasa BC, West SK, Rosenthal FS, Emmett EA, Taylor HR. (1989). “Quantitative carcinogenesis in man: solar ultraviolet B dose dependence of skin cancer in Maryland watermen.” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 81(24):1910-1913. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/81.24.1910. • Description: This study demonstrates a dose-dependent relationship between UVB exposure and non-melanoma skin cancer in Maryland watermen, showing higher cancer rates in those with greater occupational sun exposure. • Link: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/81.24.1910 • Citation:
- Rosso S, Zanetti R, Martinez C, et al. (1996). “The multicentre south European study ‘Helios’. II: Different sun exposure patterns in the aetiology of basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin.” British Journal of Cancer, 73(11):1447-1454. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.275. • Description: This study compares sun exposure patterns and finds that intermittent exposure is strongly linked to basal cell carcinoma, while chronic exposure is more associated with squamous cell carcinoma. It highlights distinct UV-related pathways for different skin cancers. • Link: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.275
Additional Notes
• Mechanistic Evidence: Many of these studies emphasize that UV radiation causes skin cancer by damaging DNA in skin cells, leading to mutations (e.g., in the p53 gene) that initiate carcinogenesis. This is supported by experimental studies showing UV-induced DNA damage in both human and animal models. • Consensus from Health Organizations: The World Health Organization (WHO), American Cancer Society, and Cancer Research UK consistently state that UV radiation from the sun is the primary cause of skin cancer, with over 80-90% of cases attributed to UV exposure. • Limitations: Some studies note that while the link between UV exposure and skin cancer is strong, factors like skin type, genetic predisposition, and measurement errors in exposure assessment can complicate findings.
• Counterclaims: Social media posts claiming sun exposure does not cause skin cancer (e.g., attributing it to diet) have been debunked by Reuters, citing the overwhelming evidence for UV radiation’s role. No credible studies support diet as a primary cause.
Arent they on the same team?
The text points toward Jesus meaning something more than a metaphor, especially because of the crowd’s intense reaction and his refusal to clarify. The Last Supper connects the dots, making it clear he was pointing to a real, sacramental presence in the Eucharist. Cannibalism involves physically eating human flesh, which is obviously not what’s happening here. Catholics see the Eucharist as a spiritual and divine encounter, not a literal chomping on Jesus’ body. The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 1374-1376) explains it as receiving Christ whole and entire—body, blood, soul, and divinity—in a way that nourishes the soul, not the stomach. It’s not a metaphor and it’s required lest you have no life in you.
But why read a book compiled by people who supposedly and according to you, want to control you?
Isnt the more likely answer that the church was established by Christ and they keep his teachings safe?
No no it’s definitely a Satanic cult that compiled and censored the teachings of Christ in order to control and manipulate the masses…
I sometimes wonder how you people even get by day to day.
Why should I heed the teaching of those occupying the seat of Peter, when I have only one teacher, Jesus?
Heeding the teachings of those occupying the Seat of Peter (the Pope) is rooted in the belief that Jesus established a visible Church with a structure of authority to guide His followers. In Matthew 16:18-19, Jesus says to Peter, “You are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church… I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven.” Catholics interpret this as Jesus appointing Peter as the first leader of His Church, with the authority to bind and loose, a role that continues through his successors, the Popes.
While Jesus is the ultimate Teacher and Head of the Church, Catholics believe He entrusted the Church with the mission to teach and safeguard His truth (Matthew 28:19-20). The Pope, as the successor of Peter, is seen as the visible head of the Church on earth, guided by the Holy Spirit to preserve the deposit of faith (John 16:13). This does not replace Jesus’ teachings but ensures they are faithfully interpreted and applied amidst changing times. The Catechism of the Catholic Church (CCC 882) states, “The Pope… enjoys, by the divine assistance promised to him in blessed Peter, that infallibility which the divine Redeemer willed his Church to have in defining doctrine concerning faith or morals.” Thus, Catholics are called to heed the Pope’s authoritative teachings, especially on matters of faith and morals, as an extension of obedience to Christ, who established this structure.
This does not diminish Jesus as the one Teacher but reflects the Catholic belief that He works through His Church, including the Petrine office, to guide believers. The Pope’s role is to serve as a steward of Christ’s teachings, not to supplant them, ensuring unity and fidelity to the Gospel.
No, all look at the data. You got this big boy.