Justice Amy Coney Barrett had pointed words on Friday for her colleague Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, accusing Jackson of taking an "extreme" position on the role of the judiciary branch.
Writing in her Supreme Court opinion on nationwide injunctions, Barrett said Jackson’s dissent contained "rhetoric," and she signaled that the liberal justice’s arguments were not worth much attention.
"We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself," Barrett wrote. "We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."
Yeah, but things are changing.
"Barrett eviscerates Jackson, Sotomayor takes on a 'complicit' court in contentious final opinions"
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/barrett-eviscerates-jackson-sotomayor-takes-complicit-court-contentious-final-opinions
Justice Amy Coney Barrett had pointed words on Friday for her colleague Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, accusing Jackson of taking an "extreme" position on the role of the judiciary branch.
Writing in her Supreme Court opinion on nationwide injunctions, Barrett said Jackson’s dissent contained "rhetoric," and she signaled that the liberal justice’s arguments were not worth much attention.
"We will not dwell on Justice Jackson’s argument, which is at odds with more than two centuries’ worth of precedent, not to mention the Constitution itself," Barrett wrote. "We observe only this: Justice Jackson decries an imperial Executive while embracing an imperial Judiciary."
The gloves are off.