This is a main argument of detractors, not saying you're one ... but the main argument is "Oh, so you'll blindly follow Trump?"
Make a good argument and I'll question Trump.
But what's the actual argument? A bill from Trump (that the guy I'm responding to didn't even read), is being directly compared to a bill from Biden (which the guy I'm responding to also didn't read), and hypothesizing they're the same thing.
Is that a good argument? No ... I'll default to Trump has done nothing wrong all day long, every day under that circumstance. Make the case he did something actually wrong that is even slightly credible and I'll research it and consider it.
And even if there ends up being a good argument against Trump, in the end, I'm not so naive to think that WW3 won't have casualties. I don't expect everything the whitehats do to be great moves without collateral damage. But if I'm still here under the notion that Q allowed half the country to have decades shaved off their lifespans through covid shots -- I doubt anyone is going to provide an example more damning against Q than that.
Magav, you're probably familiar with the idea of a strawman argument?
AE is suggest a possibility that he thinks is worth considering: that Trump setup the Big Beautiful Bill as a strawman that he deliberately wants knocked down, in order to do X. So the idea is NOT that Trump is doing anything wrong here. The idea is that Trump is doing what he's doing (which is right) but that its wrong for us to simply think that what's on the surface is the whole story.
"The choice to know will be yours"
Personally, I'm of a different opinion to AE's one, but I understand the point he's attempting to make.
P.s.
Make a good argument and I'll question Trump.
The suggestion being offered to you is not to "question Trump" but to question your own understanding of what Trump is doing. Question what Trump is doing, where Question = 'seek the truth' by thinking NOT Question = 'second guess or distrust'.
This is a main argument of detractors, not saying you're one ... but the main argument is "Oh, so you'll blindly follow Trump?"
Make a good argument and I'll question Trump.
But what's the actual argument? A bill from Trump (that the guy I'm responding to didn't even read), is being directly compared to a bill from Biden (which the guy I'm responding to also didn't read), and hypothesizing they're the same thing.
Is that a good argument? No ... I'll default to Trump has done nothing wrong all day long, every day under that circumstance. Make the case he did something actually wrong that is even slightly credible and I'll research it and consider it.
And even if there ends up being a good argument against Trump, in the end, I'm not so naive to think that WW3 won't have casualties. I don't expect everything the whitehats do to be great moves without collateral damage. But if I'm still here under the notion that Q allowed half the country to have decades shaved off their lifespans through covid shots -- I doubt anyone is going to provide an example more damning against Q than that.
Magav, you're probably familiar with the idea of a strawman argument?
AE is suggest a possibility that he thinks is worth considering: that Trump setup the Big Beautiful Bill as a strawman that he deliberately wants knocked down, in order to do X. So the idea is NOT that Trump is doing anything wrong here. The idea is that Trump is doing what he's doing (which is right) but that its wrong for us to simply think that what's on the surface is the whole story.
"The choice to know will be yours"
Personally, I'm of a different opinion to AE's one, but I understand the point he's attempting to make.
P.s.
The suggestion being offered to you is not to "question Trump" but to question your own understanding of what Trump is doing. Question what Trump is doing, where Question = 'seek the truth' by thinking NOT Question = 'second guess or distrust'.