It wouldn’t be about that, it would be to prevent someone from being able to accrue controlling interest of too much property.
If it’s needed, sure, but attach a cost to it.
The U.K. Has been one landowner for a long time, for instance. In Canada, one entire province is effectively controlled by a single person (but still owned by the crown).
It may still be a bad idea, but it’s worth discussing.
FYI to both, taxes on rents are constitutional, and should not go away.
It wouldn’t be about that, it would be to prevent someone from being able to accrue controlling interest of too much property.
If it’s needed, sure, but attach a cost to it.
The U.K. Has been one landowner for a long time, for instance. In Canada, one entire province is effectively controlled by a single person (but still owned by the crown).
It may still be a bad idea, but it’s worth discussing.
FYI to both, taxes on rents are constitutional, and should not go away.
u/Cuomos_nipple_rings