I post something about parliament and you pedantically reply on a minor detail of it which has no bearing at all about what I am posting, are you for real?
Of course, you gather this is a rhetorical question, just as the final part of the sentence you wrote.
It is neither pedantic or derogatory to point out a mistake, as the answer is neither minor nor irrelevant to the point you are trying to make. If that reason escapes you, you already know the obvious answer.
Just follow the the money carriers .... from 1100 - 1680: Traders, bankers, and Pirates ....
I post something about parliament and you pedantically reply on a minor detail of it which has no bearing at all about what I am posting, are you for real?
Did you just lose more than a password?
Of course, you gather this is a rhetorical question, just as the final part of the sentence you wrote.
It is neither pedantic or derogatory to point out a mistake, as the answer is neither minor nor irrelevant to the point you are trying to make. If that reason escapes you, you already know the obvious answer.
Just follow the the money carriers .... from 1100 - 1680: Traders, bankers, and Pirates ....
WTF was all that about? Blocked.