I get it, but the important thing is whether statements are true or not, which is why my point still prevails.
If you are in the business of challenging the veracity of every claim you encounter, without any prompting reason, your family life must be seething. You forget that in courts of law, there is a presumption of innocence and the expectation of truth. Once someone is caught in a lie, there can be hell to pay, but not before then. It will be easy enough to substantiate or debunk his claim, so the question is: are you going to do it? Or just say that whatever you dislike is a lie?
I get it, but the important thing is whether statements are true or not, which is why my point still prevails.
If you are in the business of challenging the veracity of every claim you encounter, without any prompting reason, your family life must be seething. You forget that in courts of law, there is a presumption of innocence and the expectation of truth. Once someone is caught in a lie, there can be hell to pay, but not before then. It will be easy enough to substantiate or debunk his claim, so the question is: are you going to do it? Or just say that whatever you dislike is a lie?
Start with the q drops. When you get to me, you won't.
your church life must be seething
If you can't communicate in plain language, too bad.