No online connection. I determine what it can and cannot read. This way, I prevent contamination.

Basically, the salient is point is not the vast body of bullshit created by bots ... I feed it the salient points of humanity.

I can then contrast it with several versions of AI, like perplexity, and see what comes from it.

In the end, I am the decider, and not AI.

One of the issues with AI is, that a word or syllable is just a representation of a number. Based on probability and statistics it tries to predict the next set of letters. That the outcome makes sense to us, is of no consequence. It simply performs according to an algo.

For instance: the word: de-finit-ion basically means: moving away from the borderline. So, when we inquire after what a matter is, we want to use such word as to put it in a border, a frame, otherwise, this does not differ from that.

So, in essence, we are using a word with a meaning of the **opposite ** of what we want and do. In regular life, we do not give a rats ass about it, of course. However, there is reason to be circumspect, because of the nature of the universe on a quantum level expressed with the words: be careful what you wish for.

It is just one example of cognitive dissonance in daily life.

AI has a hard time to comprehend that as a word or syllable represents calculations, a mathematical expression that needs following. It is void of meaning in and of itself. We assign meaning to it!

Mathematics is called: the language of God. I am not sorry to say: bollocks.

Mathematics is a model, an approximation that may or may not hold true. I can see the attraction of modelling.

Instead, I am trying to get my locally running AI to take in salient point to which to measure certain aspects. The issue I am running into is the use of certain words of Latin origin that are meant to be mis-used due to the combination of prefixes and suffixes giving the word a vector away from the thrust it should and ought to have.