Personally, I still believe in the Plan, partly because it's the only think that offers an explanation for all that has happened and is happening, partly due to the proofs, and partly because of my hope for the children of the world who need saving.

As a professional who assists organizations through change, I am very familiar with change leadership and all of the variables involved. One of the most difficult concepts is balance, specifically how to maintain the faith of early adopters of change and a new paradigm (similar to early Anons) as the change process unfolds and appears (to early adopters) to be stalling out due to their expectations and need for resolution (consider the reaction--both the speed and the voracity--each time something occurs that does not fit the expectations of Anons--patience with the Plan is growing thin, based on my observation).

Assuming the Plan is unfolding according to plan, I am puzzled by the lack of engagement by the Q Team to reassure Anons. Leaving it up to Anons to "see" the cues risks the erosion of the movement. For example, seeing "17" in many instances is either a comm from Q, or it is self-fulfilling prophecy that eventually wears out and turns people off. Out of a random 100 Anons, what percent are always going to believe it is a Q/Plan comm? If 10 percent start doubting because they conclude that their ability to see"17's" is nothing more than their programmed bias, then the Anons become 10 percent weaker.

The longer this storm takes to play out, and if the most serious expectations (Epstein for example) are shattered, the more the Anon base will question the bedrock of the movement: We have it all; NCSWIC; etc. And as they question, many will leave, or become disinterested, or worse, turn against the movement.

I guess my advice to the Q Team is (and I know, they don't need it, nor did they ask, but I am sharing it for my own sanity): You need to re-engage your base, and reassure them, before too many stop choosing to believe or to be involved. We need some type of touchpoint, check-in, milestone, etc.that let's us know that this is not a psyop, and that we have not been duped, and this touchpoint needs to be direct, not some obscure clue that is cloaked in too much reasonable doubt requiring more faith. We need ammo to reply to family and friends who want to know where Q is, now? We need the timeline reviewed, and we need to know that the cabal is being dismantled.

So, it will be interesting to see this play out. In 90 days will we have arrived at "I told you so" moments where we get to shove Q in the faces of so many regarding some of the more egregious things perpetrated by the Deep State? And will it be obvious, or will it be obscured by some lawfare bullshit, or cloaked among clues requiring the fall back of a "how many coincidences" rationale? Will we have received confirmation from Q that all is still going well? All this is to say that either the movie is ending very soon with a huge bang, or there will need to be some type of comms, otherwise the community of active Anons will shrink dramatically--that's just a reality based on humans experiencing change fatigue.

How will Q manage this change leadership endeavor so that we don't erode the Anon base?

BTW, I posted this last night and it was a bit late, so I have re-posted it with the hope of generating more discussion.