It's wrong to put words into someone's mouth and THEN proceed to attack or criticize or blame them for those words.
One wonders what Mr. Titor meant. His words certainly implied either a sort of Christ-like return or a faked Christ-like return. But he didn't state that outright, so there is some ambiguity to his comments. The correct approach is to request clarification. After that, you can critique or discuss based on accuracy of communication.
"Form, message, communication" is a signoff line I've had on my personal email form for more than two decades.
When a message is expressed in a form that fits it perfectly and properly, communication can be accomplished. But sometimes it's important and necessary to check, verify that you've understood the right message from the form that you encounter.
I suppose everyone thinks it's a coincidence that I'm mentioned what I did in the above linked post yesterday, and then that very night Papi ALSO posts about his passing???
Did you guys learn the comms or nah?
Coincidencefag much?
The future has a way of proving the past.
Youre right he doesnt say the death/resurrection words. After his ridiculous failed flooding prediction, seems hes going with slightly vague posts that leave just enough wiggle room to backpedal if needed.
What he originally said here (or on his "Trump will return in 3 days" post) doesnt imply faking death. Faking death isnt biblical whatsoever, and what relevance does him receiving the jab have if hes just faking and re-appearing in 3 days? I actaully asked him that twice and he wont answer. I assume answering them wouldnt leave enough wiggle to backpedal out of.
His now deleted statement about 'Trump knows that I know' certainly needs no further clarification. Thats just crazy talk.
I seem to recall serialbrain2 talking about Q team communicating with him too. Right about that time I knew he was losing the plot. Or as some other anon called it..."his head was so far up his own ass he actually started turning inside-out".
It's wrong to put words into someone's mouth and THEN proceed to attack or criticize or blame them for those words.
One wonders what Mr. Titor meant. His words certainly implied either a sort of Christ-like return or a faked Christ-like return. But he didn't state that outright, so there is some ambiguity to his comments. The correct approach is to request clarification. After that, you can critique or discuss based on accuracy of communication.
"Form, message, communication" is a signoff line I've had on my personal email form for more than two decades.
When a message is expressed in a form that fits it perfectly and properly, communication can be accomplished. But sometimes it's important and necessary to check, verify that you've understood the right message from the form that you encounter.
u/AllMostThere
His original comment can be viewed here. Some very clever anon showed me the "revisions" link...Thank you to that clever anon btw.
Youre right he doesnt say the death/resurrection words. After his ridiculous failed flooding prediction, seems hes going with slightly vague posts that leave just enough wiggle room to backpedal if needed.
What he originally said here (or on his "Trump will return in 3 days" post) doesnt imply faking death. Faking death isnt biblical whatsoever, and what relevance does him receiving the jab have if hes just faking and re-appearing in 3 days? I actaully asked him that twice and he wont answer. I assume answering them wouldnt leave enough wiggle to backpedal out of.
His now deleted statement about 'Trump knows that I know' certainly needs no further clarification. Thats just crazy talk.
I seem to recall serialbrain2 talking about Q team communicating with him too. Right about that time I knew he was losing the plot. Or as some other anon called it..."his head was so far up his own ass he actually started turning inside-out".
Thought of serialbrain2 as well.