Q originally released on 4chan. Then 8chan. Eventually we found ourselves at Voat. In these places, you needed to be prepared to vigorously defend good ideas, let alone bad ones.
Q actually asked us to move to Voat. That place was a shithole -- the entire community was mostly rejected by former Voat users and we were continually hazed just for trying to use a little corner of their forum for ourselves.
I don't think any veteran of Q has such delicate sensibilities that they believe I've crossed a line of being too harsh.
The picture JohnTutor17 was painting was that Trump was dead (Trump's passing) and going to "come back" in 3 days. Whatever harshness you detected on my part was on a proper scale to the ridiculousness of the claim -- which I perceived as blastphemy.
I'm not alone. Prior to responding to his post, he was already ratioed. Even the mods mocked JohnTutor17 by calling out his ridiculous prediction of a flood / tidal wave with a pinned thread.
He had the opportunity to defend his comments and win people over to his point of view. He chose, instead, to revise the craziness out of his comments. Either way, that's the way the forum should work -- refine good ideas and weed out bad ones.
I'm not alone. Prior to responding to his post, he was already ratioed. Even the mods mocked JohnTutor17 by calling out his ridiculous prediction of a flood / tidal wave with a pinned thread.
He had the opportunity to defend his comments and win people over to his point of view. He chose, instead, to revise the craziness out of his comments. Either way, that's the way the forum should work -- refine good ideas and weed out bad ones.
You’ll note that I did not call AllMostThere out for doing that exact thing, but did call you out, and very clearly, for making up your own interpretation of his words, then very aggressively attacking him and “his comments” based on your own words while discussing them as if that is absolutely what was said, then continuing to insist that your words were his words, which you’ve done to myself and others.
If that’s not your intention, you need to pay attention and work on that, where you have repeatedly not appeared inclined to do either, which is disrespectful of other posters.
JohnTitor17 has a whole catalog of craziness on GAW.
A good portion of his content has him pretending to be a Q insider -- stating things as matter of fact which are completely unknowable to the public.
Another good portion has him stating things as though he is a prophet of God.
There has to be a counter to it -- otherwise the entire forum could be nullified with a thousand AI bots spewing supposed Q insider information and biblical prophecies which are unsourced and unknowable from data available to the public.
based on your own words
Let's get one thing straight, I'm not the only one who interpreted his words like that. He was ratioed before I ever found his comment.
Words have meanings, these were his own words. If there is another way to interpret "Trump's passing" used in context of negating someone who wished Trump a long healthy life has another potential meaning, feel free to clarify it, because he sure didn't.
Q originally released on 4chan. Then 8chan. Eventually we found ourselves at Voat. In these places, you needed to be prepared to vigorously defend good ideas, let alone bad ones.
Q actually asked us to move to Voat. That place was a shithole -- the entire community was mostly rejected by former Voat users and we were continually hazed just for trying to use a little corner of their forum for ourselves.
I don't think any veteran of Q has such delicate sensibilities that they believe I've crossed a line of being too harsh.
The picture JohnTutor17 was painting was that Trump was dead (Trump's passing) and going to "come back" in 3 days. Whatever harshness you detected on my part was on a proper scale to the ridiculousness of the claim -- which I perceived as blastphemy.
I'm not alone. Prior to responding to his post, he was already ratioed. Even the mods mocked JohnTutor17 by calling out his ridiculous prediction of a flood / tidal wave with a pinned thread.
He had the opportunity to defend his comments and win people over to his point of view. He chose, instead, to revise the craziness out of his comments. Either way, that's the way the forum should work -- refine good ideas and weed out bad ones.
You’ll note that I did not call AllMostThere out for doing that exact thing, but did call you out, and very clearly, for making up your own interpretation of his words, then very aggressively attacking him and “his comments” based on your own words while discussing them as if that is absolutely what was said, then continuing to insist that your words were his words, which you’ve done to myself and others.
If that’s not your intention, you need to pay attention and work on that, where you have repeatedly not appeared inclined to do either, which is disrespectful of other posters.
JohnTitor17 has a whole catalog of craziness on GAW.
A good portion of his content has him pretending to be a Q insider -- stating things as matter of fact which are completely unknowable to the public.
Another good portion has him stating things as though he is a prophet of God.
There has to be a counter to it -- otherwise the entire forum could be nullified with a thousand AI bots spewing supposed Q insider information and biblical prophecies which are unsourced and unknowable from data available to the public.
Let's get one thing straight, I'm not the only one who interpreted his words like that. He was ratioed before I ever found his comment.
Words have meanings, these were his own words. If there is another way to interpret "Trump's passing" used in context of negating someone who wished Trump a long healthy life has another potential meaning, feel free to clarify it, because he sure didn't.