I'm writing this because I do not understand how so many people who call themselves Anons have allowed themselves to be convinced of something that is
completely antithetical to Q's words.
With respect, and with the understanding that sticky does not = endorsement, I think it's a mistake for the mods to promote posts that fill some of you with hope for "100% disclosure", all the while being completely and utterly contradictory to things Q spelled out for us clearly, definitively, and in simple English.
Like what are we even doing here guys?
u/mods u/catsfive: Clearly this is a very emotional topic for many here. Promoting things (posts) that your own good sense and (vast?) knowledge of Q should preclude you from doing is going to cause some of the weaker minded individuals here to have a meltdown.
Just read some of the hysterical comments that are sure to be offered in response to this post.
Fear. Anger. Irrationality.
And hostility towards myself simply for daring to break their delusions by providing the Q Sauce anyone worthy of the title of "Anon" should already know.
Now either this is a Q Board or it's not.
What did Q say on the topic?
What. Did. Q. Say?
Amid all the Epstein Controversy, Dan Dropped a 24 sec vid Sunday. Q24: "... FOR THE BETTERMENT of the country NOT ALL WILL BE PROSECUTED and all will do as told. You will see more of this occur (not normal yet disregarded) and even on the D side."
Dan's drop today:
https://files.catbox.moe/ec4ruu.jpeg
The Sticky post that featured it:
https://greatawakening.win/p/19Ba8MinnM/dan-scavino-posts-video-of-mt-fu/
u/#q24
FULL disclosure was never, ever promised.
But WINNING WAS.
It will be our choice whether to know.
It will never be openly (Fully) disclosed.
No, we're never going to be able to throw a big fat "I told you so" in the face of our friends and relatives re: this topic.
How sure are you that any of the pedo stuff even happened? I think we're all pretty sure here.
I am.
And HOW do we know all the pedo shit happened?
Because Q told us. And provided evidence.
And I believe him.
But Q also told us "It will be your choice whether to know." ⬇️
https://files.catbox.moe/srasxe.jpeg
Q2007 & Q2604:
"Emotions cloud judgment."
The way you know you're thinking clearly, rationally and wisely is if you can see and understand 'THE WHY'.
"It had to be this way."
I'm NOT suggesting any of these child predators will go unpunished.
Quite the contrary.
The entire premise of this post is to suggest, as Q clearly insinuated, that the amount of pedo DECLAS is likely to leave many wanting.
u/#q27
u/#q29
If you believe what Q said...
If you are thinking clearly and rationally and you can understand 'THE WHY', then consider giving this a like.
BUT if you are not thinking rationally...
If you do not understand 'the why'...
If you do not trust the plan...
If you don't GAF what 100% disclosure would do to society, the world...
If you want it your way and don't give a fuck about what Q said...
Then set community styling "OFF" and come give this post a down vote.
Life is hard. It's even harder for those unable to set aside their emotions and think logically.
Will you and your children being saved by the white hats from 1000 years of darkness and tyranny be enough for you?
Is guaranteed WINNING enough?
This certainly won't get sticky. I may even get a ban for it. But I couldn't sit back any longer and let people go deeper into this bottomless pit of fallacy that is explicitly contradicted by Q.
Fuck.
WWG1WGA!
So...."Less than 10" decided to keep them up, potentially damaging the op?
Are we to believe that those in Q branch don't have the power to have rescinded them on day 1 if they were hijacked and posted erroneously?
Kinda along the lines of: "The spirit of the letter"...
I look at the "spirit of the message" - and what I see is a positive message made in good faith - and one that doesn't hurt anyone, unless their MO is to put fingers in their ears and shout, "la la la ..."
Q is literally saving the world... but can't get their messaging right...
Uh... okay...
u/#highcat
Qs tripcode changed a couple times, and any change was always confirmed by the Qteam.
https://qagg.news/?q=tripcode&q2=
Yes its odd that there was no correction of those newer posts under a completely unconfirmed tripcode. But one of the reasons Q changed tripcodes in the past was when the old one was compromised (meaning someone else could post as Q).
This drop shows the importance of having 100% iron-clad confirmation that its actually Q posting.
It was discovered that lower level random admins had elevated access, and therefore couldve posted on Q's board around the time those newer posts appeared. But those admins wouldnt have been able to post with Q's existing tripcode, or have a way to verify a tripcode change.
Err on the side of caution. They raise some interesting theoretical questions that for some reason were never mentioned in any of the other Qdrops. But they are Shcrodinger drops (neither confirmed or unconfirmed), and thats just not good enough for this anon.
Thanks u/AlmostThere
I always keep in mind, Q is run by humans... and therefore NOT infallible.