https://youtu.be/aWNzq9OWGmY?si=MwIbegPXjuQ-f_0m
A very interesting lecture if you have the time to listen to it. She has an interesting book too.
She talks about how it was physically impossible for the twin towers to collapse in the way we were told when hit by a plane, and that it was likely directed energy weapons responsible for the destruction of the buildings.
This is one of the most convincing takes I've ever heard on how the towers collapsed.
I watched two of her big lectures on the twin towers. Two things struck me. 1) its obvious she knows her physics and physical sciences. 2) unfortunately, the words and phrases she uses makes her sound like a loon. I think its her way of adjusting her physics speak to be palatable to the lay person and I applaud her for trying to do that. Yet, she still "sounds" like a loon. I think that if not for that, her message would have had broader reach. Remember this as you watch her videos and don't dismiss her outright. Don't be surprised if you find the word "dustification" sneaking into your vocabulary though!
When I remember her theory, “dustified” is the word I associate with her.