It might not be the popular thing to accept, but it is increasingly clear there is no way to get to any form of accountability or legal exposure for Russiagate or the manufacturing of the Trump-Russia collusion narrative, anywhere near former President Barack Obama. The concentric circles of plausible deniability are just too extensive.
Essentially, despite the evidence of the FBI participating in a manufactured investigation predicted on false pretenses, all now supported with hindsight evidence, the fact that key IC officials, namely CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, presented the illusion of credible concern, inoculates President Obama from scrutiny.
As the Supreme Court noted, the President is protected from liability for “official acts” of his office. Yes, we all know these officials knew it was a ruse; however, in 2016 the CIA and FBI were presenting the information to Obama and saying the investigative value was potentially plausible. As such, Obama would have been within his official duty to tell the IC officials to chase down the information (continue investigating it).
Thanks for the explanation. I am hopeful that the whistleblowers that Gabbard has mentioned (and Patel for that matter) will quote Obama, and erase the plausible deniability.
I also wonder if the SCOTUS will someday rule that the spirit of the immunity had to do with unintended consequences of policy decisions, not criminal actions with intent (i.e., akin to "first degree").
I am also hoping that President Trump is establishing his distance so that when it goes down, people will point at him less.
There is no way that treason, or seditious conspiracy, would be considered an official act of the presidency. Those are both felony criminal charges, one of which is punishable by hanging. We have all seen how our courts operate. They move at a snail's pace if it's going after a liberal, and often the cases aren't even heard out of lack of standing, or the conservative side just loses the case. I pray to God that's not the case here because we all know what they did.
From here:
It might not be the popular thing to accept, but it is increasingly clear there is no way to get to any form of accountability or legal exposure for Russiagate or the manufacturing of the Trump-Russia collusion narrative, anywhere near former President Barack Obama. The concentric circles of plausible deniability are just too extensive.
Essentially, despite the evidence of the FBI participating in a manufactured investigation predicted on false pretenses, all now supported with hindsight evidence, the fact that key IC officials, namely CIA Director John Brennan, FBI Director James Comey and Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, presented the illusion of credible concern, inoculates President Obama from scrutiny.
As the Supreme Court noted, the President is protected from liability for “official acts” of his office. Yes, we all know these officials knew it was a ruse; however, in 2016 the CIA and FBI were presenting the information to Obama and saying the investigative value was potentially plausible. As such, Obama would have been within his official duty to tell the IC officials to chase down the information (continue investigating it).
Q talking about treason and the shadow government 44 was running. I believe Q knows what they are speaking of.
u/#q4645
Thanks for the explanation. I am hopeful that the whistleblowers that Gabbard has mentioned (and Patel for that matter) will quote Obama, and erase the plausible deniability.
I also wonder if the SCOTUS will someday rule that the spirit of the immunity had to do with unintended consequences of policy decisions, not criminal actions with intent (i.e., akin to "first degree").
I am also hoping that President Trump is establishing his distance so that when it goes down, people will point at him less.
Here's hoping.
There is no way that treason, or seditious conspiracy, would be considered an official act of the presidency. Those are both felony criminal charges, one of which is punishable by hanging. We have all seen how our courts operate. They move at a snail's pace if it's going after a liberal, and often the cases aren't even heard out of lack of standing, or the conservative side just loses the case. I pray to God that's not the case here because we all know what they did.