🚨 Mother Agapia believes “The Rapture” is a False Christian Belief promoted from "new theology" in the 1800’s without roots in foundational Christianity
• In discussing Christian Zionism's desire to rebuild the Temple on the Temple Mount, Mother Agapia describes the belief in the rapture as a key component of their theology.
• She explains that this idea stems from a 19th-century interpretation originating in the 1830s with figures like John Nelson Darby and Cyrus Scofield, who promoted a "new theology" without roots in foundational Christianity.
• According to her, Christian Zionists believe they will be "swooped up into heaven" during end-times events, avoiding the chaos of a third world war or global conflict, only to return after the fighting ends. She calls this a "false belief" and a heresy condemned by the early Church in 381 AD at the Council of Constantinople, emphasizing there is no literal thousand-year kingdom or future millennium to await.
• She argues this theology denies Christ's fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies, promotes division over compassion, and justifies actions like supporting Israel's expansion, which she sees as contrary to true Christian values.
How This Ends?
• Mother Agapia states that the outcome depends on collective action, particularly from Christians in the United States, as U.S. policy holds the key to Israel's actions.
• She urges political change: Christians must wake up, demand an end to unconditional support for Israel, and push for a sovereign Palestinian state with defined borders, possibly through a two-state solution or confederation. Wealthy Arab nations like Saudi Arabia and Qatar could fund Gaza's reconstruction as a Palestinian-led project, not a "Riviera" for outsiders, allowing self-development without Israeli military presence.
• Without this, she warns of continued ethnic cleansing, slow starvation, or forced transfer of Palestinians, leading to a third world war or major global conflict.
• Spiritually, she calls for living by Christ's principles of compassion, tolerance, and love, preparing for judgment rather than pursuing earthly kingdoms or rebuilding the Temple.
Of course he did. It's one of his primary teachings. Jesus is as New Age as it gets. He literally promised a New Heaven and a New Earth.
The problem is that modern Christians are following Church doctrine, not Jesus's teachings. They repeat 1 or 2 verses which are inaccurate representations of what he said.
"There is no way to the father but through me"
First of all, what does this have to do with being murdered for God? Nothing. So why do modern Christians disregard his teachings in favor of a pagan blood sacrifice?
Jesus spoke Aramaic. No one tries to research what he really said because it reverses much of what the Church taught.
He said ABWOON (Source) not ABBA (Father). His entire message was about God being within us. There is no way to Source but to go within. His message is the only way, not worship of angry gods ordering murder and slavery (anunnaki). Not once did Jesus refer to Yahweh-Jehovah as God.
Jesus didn't say he would return to rule this world as a king, he said he'd take us where he is. A place where "many mansions" are prepared (5D Earth).
What will happen? "in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed".... "One will be taken and one will be left behind." (People will vanish)
How will we know it's coming? "At that time they will see the Son of Man (like humans) coming in a cloud with power and great glory (UFOs). When these things begin to take place, stand up and lift up your heads, because your redemption is drawing near.”
Jesus didn't practice blood rituals to God so he couldn't have been a final sacrifice to his own God. He never mentioned Yahweh or Jehovah at all. He didn't claim he was going to die for our sins. In the story, he didn't volunteer, he was betrayed.
He taught that God was within and we will do even greater miracles. Modern Christians mindlessly repeats slogans like "Jesus is King", and are clearly believe more in the power of demons than angels.
Jesus didn't create religion. He didn't travel around telling people he was God. He said the kingdom of God is within us, that we are gods too, and we will do greater miracles than he did.
Church doctrine is brainwashing to keep you away from what Jesus taught.
Alright, let’s roll up our sleeves and address this grab-bag of Gnostic reinterpretations, New Age word-salad, and conspiracy garnish.
“Jesus didn’t teach ascension.”
Well, that’s awkward, because the guy literally ascended. Luke 24:51 and Acts 1:9 are fairly explicit. Unless “was taken up into heaven” is Aramaic for “relocated to a fifth-dimensional crystal realm,” we’re dealing with a plain historical claim. And in the postmillennial frame, that ascension was the enthronement of Christ at the right hand of the Father (Psalm 110:1; Daniel 7:13-14), which is precisely why the Kingdom grows like leaven until the nations are discipled. That is not “New Age” unless you think Isaiah and David were running yoga retreats.
“Jesus was as New Age as it gets… God is within us.”
Jesus did not teach “you are God” in the Oprah sense. He taught that the Spirit dwells in believers (John 14:17), which is entirely different from a “divine spark” pantheism. Postmillennialists agree the Kingdom is within and among us (Luke 17:21), but that’s because the King is presently reigning, not because we all just need to “go within” and find our inner Source. If your “Source” sounds like something you can order at a vegan juice bar, you’re not exegeting the text — you’re projecting your worldview onto it.
“No pagan blood sacrifice.”
The claim that the cross is a “pagan blood ritual” is like saying oxygen is a Roman conspiracy because soldiers also breathed it. The entire Old Testament sacrificial system (instituted by Yahweh Himself) points to Christ as the Lamb of God (Isaiah 53, John 1:29). Jesus repeatedly predicted His death for sins (Mark 10:45; Matthew 26:28), not as an unfortunate betrayal He hadn’t factored in. In the postmillennial perspective, that death is the very hinge on which history turns, because it broke Satan’s authority (John 12:31-32), setting in motion the gradual discipling of the nations.
“Jesus never mentioned Yahweh or Jehovah.”
This is historically and linguistically illiterate. Every time Jesus quoted the Old Testament, He was invoking the covenant God of Israel — and doing so as the Son who shares His name and glory (John 17:5-6). In fact, in John 8:58 He directly takes the divine name for Himself (“Before Abraham was, I am”). That’s not Him quietly handing out business cards for the Anunnaki. That’s Him identifying with Yahweh in the flesh.
“Many mansions = 5D Earth.”
That’s not exegesis; that’s numerology with a sci-fi budget. “Many rooms” in John 14 refers to the covenantal dwelling place of God with man, ultimately fulfilled in the New Heavens and New Earth (Revelation 21). Postmillennialists would note that this isn’t about evacuating to a sky-resort but about the eventual full arrival of God’s presence with His people here, after the knowledge of the Lord has covered the earth.
“One taken, one left” = people vanish in UFOs.
Context check: in Luke 17 and Matthew 24, the “taken” are the ones judged, just like in the days of Noah when the flood “took” them away. Being “left” is the good outcome. Swapping “flood” for “flying saucer” is not hermeneutics, it’s fan fiction.
“Jesus didn’t create religion… didn’t claim to be God.”
He didn’t create religion; He fulfilled it. And His claim to deity is woven through all four Gospels. You have to work very hard to miss it — and by “work hard” I mean “snip out large portions of text and replace them with something you found on a Reddit UFO thread.”
Postmillennial punchline:
The irony here is that the “Jesus” being presented is basically a galactic life coach who came to tell us to think positive and wait for a cosmic Uber to the 5th dimension. The biblical Jesus, enthroned now, is reigning until every enemy is put under His feet (1 Corinthians 15:25). That reign grows in history, not retreats into an inner meditative bubble. The New Heavens and New Earth aren’t a spiritual escapism — they are the culmination of Christ’s victorious Kingdom advancing in real space-time.
I love posts like the one you are responding to. People that are SOOO confident in their false beliefs like to list them out as the OP did. Clearly nothing you say will jar this know-it-all from their positions. But it gives well spoken people like you the opportunity to set the record straight and educate those whose heart's are prepared to believe....
This is the logic that comes from not reading the Bible lol. If that were true, you'd be seeing many Biblical scholars coming to the same conclusions. The reality is none of that is true, and if you want to see someone with that heretical mindset get absolutely dog walked, watch Billy Carson and Wes Huffs debate that happened earlier this year.
🚨 Mother Agapia believes “The Rapture” is a False Christian Belief promoted from "new theology" in the 1800’s without roots in foundational Christianity
• In discussing Christian Zionism's desire to rebuild the Temple on the Temple Mount, Mother Agapia describes the belief in the rapture as a key component of their theology.
• She explains that this idea stems from a 19th-century interpretation originating in the 1830s with figures like John Nelson Darby and Cyrus Scofield, who promoted a "new theology" without roots in foundational Christianity.
• According to her, Christian Zionists believe they will be "swooped up into heaven" during end-times events, avoiding the chaos of a third world war or global conflict, only to return after the fighting ends. She calls this a "false belief" and a heresy condemned by the early Church in 381 AD at the Council of Constantinople, emphasizing there is no literal thousand-year kingdom or future millennium to await.
• She argues this theology denies Christ's fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies, promotes division over compassion, and justifies actions like supporting Israel's expansion, which she sees as contrary to true Christian values.
How This Ends?
• Mother Agapia states that the outcome depends on collective action, particularly from Christians in the United States, as U.S. policy holds the key to Israel's actions.
• She urges political change: Christians must wake up, demand an end to unconditional support for Israel, and push for a sovereign Palestinian state with defined borders, possibly through a two-state solution or confederation. Wealthy Arab nations like Saudi Arabia and Qatar could fund Gaza's reconstruction as a Palestinian-led project, not a "Riviera" for outsiders, allowing self-development without Israeli military presence.
• Without this, she warns of continued ethnic cleansing, slow starvation, or forced transfer of Palestinians, leading to a third world war or major global conflict.
• Spiritually, she calls for living by Christ's principles of compassion, tolerance, and love, preparing for judgment rather than pursuing earthly kingdoms or rebuilding the Temple.
Interesting reply:
https://x.com/Kabamur_Taygeta/status/1662111028740767744
"Jesus didn't teach ascension"
Of course he did. It's one of his primary teachings. Jesus is as New Age as it gets. He literally promised a New Heaven and a New Earth.
The problem is that modern Christians are following Church doctrine, not Jesus's teachings. They repeat 1 or 2 verses which are inaccurate representations of what he said.
"There is no way to the father but through me"
First of all, what does this have to do with being murdered for God? Nothing. So why do modern Christians disregard his teachings in favor of a pagan blood sacrifice?
Jesus spoke Aramaic. No one tries to research what he really said because it reverses much of what the Church taught.
He said ABWOON (Source) not ABBA (Father). His entire message was about God being within us. There is no way to Source but to go within. His message is the only way, not worship of angry gods ordering murder and slavery (anunnaki). Not once did Jesus refer to Yahweh-Jehovah as God.
Jesus didn't say he would return to rule this world as a king, he said he'd take us where he is. A place where "many mansions" are prepared (5D Earth).
What will happen? "in a flash, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, the dead will be raised imperishable, and we will be changed".... "One will be taken and one will be left behind." (People will vanish)
How will we know it's coming? "At that time they will see the Son of Man (like humans) coming in a cloud with power and great glory (UFOs). When these things begin to take place, stand up and lift up your heads, because your redemption is drawing near.”
Jesus didn't practice blood rituals to God so he couldn't have been a final sacrifice to his own God. He never mentioned Yahweh or Jehovah at all. He didn't claim he was going to die for our sins. In the story, he didn't volunteer, he was betrayed.
He taught that God was within and we will do even greater miracles. Modern Christians mindlessly repeats slogans like "Jesus is King", and are clearly believe more in the power of demons than angels.
Jesus didn't create religion. He didn't travel around telling people he was God. He said the kingdom of God is within us, that we are gods too, and we will do greater miracles than he did.
Church doctrine is brainwashing to keep you away from what Jesus taught.
Alright, let’s roll up our sleeves and address this grab-bag of Gnostic reinterpretations, New Age word-salad, and conspiracy garnish.
Postmillennial punchline: The irony here is that the “Jesus” being presented is basically a galactic life coach who came to tell us to think positive and wait for a cosmic Uber to the 5th dimension. The biblical Jesus, enthroned now, is reigning until every enemy is put under His feet (1 Corinthians 15:25). That reign grows in history, not retreats into an inner meditative bubble. The New Heavens and New Earth aren’t a spiritual escapism — they are the culmination of Christ’s victorious Kingdom advancing in real space-time.
I award you a gold star for Extreme Mordancy and Wit. You earn my envy.
Thank you! I like to write for the same reason a dog likes to bark, it's just my nature.
Most excellent argument of the true Christ of the Bible. Thank you
I love posts like the one you are responding to. People that are SOOO confident in their false beliefs like to list them out as the OP did. Clearly nothing you say will jar this know-it-all from their positions. But it gives well spoken people like you the opportunity to set the record straight and educate those whose heart's are prepared to believe....
Well said!
Well said
Now thats what I call apologetics. My hat is off to you
Well I do go to Apologia Church :-)
This is the logic that comes from not reading the Bible lol. If that were true, you'd be seeing many Biblical scholars coming to the same conclusions. The reality is none of that is true, and if you want to see someone with that heretical mindset get absolutely dog walked, watch Billy Carson and Wes Huffs debate that happened earlier this year.