Totally forgot about that! Also doesnt it say to suggest its the plan is false? I know its another sentence but what is that referencing. Because just reading it sounds like the previous sentence.

Just something I thought about. What if it is safe on food, floors and deodorant, but they removed those sources from out society in an attempt to "reduce the sideffects" of them so they won't be in as such a high concentration in the body when they inject you. It didnt work because they kept adding more and more injections and the problem still exists.

With all of this. It cleans Trumps hands in my opinion. If Dems request it not Trump release it. The media cant say Trump added his opponents to the list. Since he wasnt the one who asked for release. I had this as a hypothesis, but it seems its becoming more and more likely.

Well I think It would still cause a pop awakening to what's truly going on too. I admitted to using it wrong geez dude. I have a different opinion still even with the correct usage of the quote. A person can be wrong, which I was with the quote, yet the underlying thought remain the same with the correction. A pop awakening would feel shocking to many, would it not?

So, in the event that Trump is in the files (no real evidence so but theoretically) and that causes his arrest and its the "first arrest" and that causes people to POP AWAKEN and some may feel shock, then maybe that what all this is, I'm not trying to came this is a super true super real important post, its simply some thoughts, and one was miss quoted.

Is that enough for you? I corrected my statement, hypnosis's is now more accurate, no need to get frustrated when someone makes a mistake.

Well that's part of the hypothesis I have. However don't discount the fact that they may be on the list as well so that's why they wouldn't release it. only the people on the list know who they are right now, their collogues may not know it. I think its a vast majority of the talking heads you see are potentially, If they knew they were not going down if they exposed the list with Trump on it they would have, but no, doing so would still cause people to hold them accountable. But, this is pure speculation on my part, I don't think Trumps on that list but I'm not going to pretend its not possible, he was in those circles, still doesn't mean he is but it isn't totally out of the realm.

Haha. I didnt know what word to use and thats the first one that felt close enough thats why I said mini theories because I knew it really wasnt quite the right word. But yes hypothesis my apologies I appreciate the correction.

Well Trump is the name that would shock because why would he have faught so hard if he was on the list himself and it would take him down. Wait there was a counter operation? He was part of it? Thats if Q+ isnt Trump but who know. This is just me pouring out my theories i float in my head and seeing if someone may add to it or expand on it. Or do more research than I can because I suck at it but im trying to improve. Lol

My apologies I misquoted. It just easily gets mixed up because pop awakening would feel like a shock to some. I think thats how it happens. I was just going off memory, this is a silly theory im throwing out there just to see if someone else may have a similar thought to me.

What is intresting is President Trump said its a "100 year catastrophe" in an interview. A flood of a 100 year old camp that "elites" send their daughters? Just intredting how that lines up. It was a short clip I saw, so in context may sound less strange just weird that it showed up right around the time I was reading this. May truly be on to something here. Reguardless, the loss of life is tragic and I pray for the families grieving and still clinging to hope of their family members being found.

This is a rouge theory I think about from time to time. The first arrest will be shocking right? People have floated what if it is Trump that gets arrested. What if this is Trumps final act, save the nation after (I believe God called him to Him, and is using him for great things) all the things he knows the inner workings of potentially first hand. So thats why there is delay, Trumps finally works are still in progress, to renew America to the nation its ment to be.

So maybe Trumps on the list and to buy more time to finish the hard work they are delaying and putting out diffrent takes? And then the day the list gets released, we see Trumps name, he gets arrested. It shocks us all.

This is just a thought I've had from time to time, and who knows after the Elon accusation, etc. Idk. We shall see. Praying for you all, and in the end, the story will all end the same, but what we do till then still matters. Christ is the Victorious King!

I mean yes. I hope we keep dropping taxes left and right as its all basically proven to be a lie at this point. But this is a win and its big to have taxes drop, even $100/mo (1,200 for the year) is still more money for expenses of living that we wouldnt have been able to spend that way, with permanent spending cuts, and other things that just improve America and its economy. Yes there is more work to be done. But celebrate the win we got yesterday with this bill, its important to acknowledge how big of a blow this is the the establishment.

Can't wait to see whats to come im not tired of winning yet and Trump keeps his promises. 😜

I mean ice deports leading to potential seat loss and then tax reductions permanent cuts to waste spending i.e. their money printer is running out of ink. Again its not like I have any backing im just throwing out a random idea and seeing if anyone else sees where my thought pattern was.

But yeah, this is just me seeing the Benny Johnson tweet yesterday about the congressmen crying on the steps and was like hmm if this is the end for then. Or a signal that its the end. Then maybe it could be. Idk.

Im celebrating hard today. I started with biscuits and gravy for breakfast (I rarely have it but it always reminds me of Americana). Having bacon cheese burgers for dinner with my parents, and enjoying the fireworks. Praising The Lord for it all.

Im going to really have to think about it, gonna be in prayer over this amazing offer. Im going through a rough patch where its hard to do some of the basics right now so i feel worn down right now. If there is a way to contact you directly incase my answer is yes please let me know. I hope you have a wonderful 4th of July! And may Christ be Magnified!!

Reguardless if I say yes or no im 100% for the idea of this podcast. I think we are seeing the Church not just revive but enter a new era for this coming generation. One where we are honest not polished, but all working for The Lords benefit.

Amen. Im one of the sinners. Im ready to serve my Lord and have since calling me back to Him in 2020. I know God is planning to use my history and struggle with homosexuality to not only wake people in that community up. But also to dismantle it with my knowledge of "the other side" for lack of better words. I want to find a way to get churches to get others who struggle with homosexuality to feel welcome in the Church, not accepting the sin, but caring and walking alongside until God does the work in them to no longer struggle. It doesnt feel like it when you are in that kind of life, but it is a struggle, and I dont want those who struggle now like I used to to stay there.

Im not perfect. Never will be. And while I know I am saved my past haunts me sometimes. Yet reguardless of that feeling I will fight for The Lord, serve and obey.

To anyone struggling with any hurt, habit or hangup in life, just know this. God loves you reguardless, but it doesnt mean keep doing what you are doing. Just test God on it, I can tell you I did. Its scary but try to find a believer who is willing to walk alongside you reguardless of the ugliness that may come from it as you stumble and make mistakes.

Im sorry this is such a long comment, but I hope you hear the care in every word. May The Lord bless you and keep you frens. Love you all

Of course. Thats why I pulled definitions to make sure I was being as factual as possible. Trust me I was in college at the time when that was really kicking off. I was very much a flamboyant man at the time (God did a lot of work on me) but I was always worried and never let myself be alone with any peers let alone female ones.

Thats why I keep to the basic simple definition, not I didnt like the guy or girl after so im gonna ruin them. But its important we keep the word intact to mean what it truly is. So for example if this exact story was between two adults, its not an issue, yes she would have cheated or cucked her husband but she seduced and got what she wanted from an adult. But because its a minor there is no consent to be given, thus the act of seduction is in my opinion a form of force, preying on the potentually new (puberty) or never know sexually of a 14 year old, stripping innocence and/or sexually perverting the minor. And because of that it is rape by definition, again if looked at from my viewpoint.

This all hinges on the fact that this was a minor, who may have been willing, but is not legally or in my opinion mentally old enough to give consent. Especially to an adult. Again always exceptions for young love in high-school as they graduate kinda thing.

I hope we can all push back for the benefit of the kids and later adults who are harmed by these kinds of people. And what the media has done around that topic is disgusting. I wish it didnt take me as long as it did to finally realize after over a decade of struggle and trauma, that I needed help.

I appologize for the long replies I just have a lot to say haha. Hope all is well.

I see what you mean, my apologies if I came off hostile I am just very passionate on this topic and I can come off harsh. But yes, there is a legal difference in statutory vs non statutory. However the basic definition of rape is as follows.

"The crime of using force or the threat of force to compel a person to submit to sexual intercourse."

Force isn't just violence. Force has a few definitions as well

"To compel through pressure or necessity."

Or

"To gain by the use of force or coercion."

So the teacher being an adult and a teacher aka authority over a child/minor and student. Coerced (seduced) him into sexual acts as a minor who is unable to give consent because of his minor status. Thus that is rape. That is why its just one term in this.

Now the statutory is the legal modifier for the way treating case is handled because it presumes the child/minor can not consent even if they are a willing participant. Violence is not a modifier for rape, though violent rape should also be charged with other assault and violence charges.

I hope that helps some. Its mt best understanding of it with some quick searches to make sure I was not way off in my thoughts haha.

Edit: my reasoning for not wanting to split the definition of rape of violent vs not is because the act itself if 1 violent. And 2 does that mean someone who is on a date and gets forced upon in a car or something where no blood is spilled but its still not wanted or consented is rape, then does that mean the charges should be less for that rape? I don't think so and id hope and think you don't either. If in conversation. Mention its violent or not. But legally it should be handled and charged all the same. Otherwise the victim who is inflicted with the same traumas regardless of the violence or not will not get the same level of justice for that trauma. Rape is traumatic regardless. And that's my personally I don't make a distinction of violent or not. Because to me its all violent.

So a child can give consent to sex? Thats why its rape if its a child reguardless. Because a child does not have the mental abilities to fully process what is going on. Its the same reason we say kids shouldn't be allowed transitions. They can be manipulated or dont know the full extent of the consequences yet because they are children. Also why children are charged differently depending on the crime.

So yes its forced sex because the child can not consent to it due to them being so young and not having that level of autonomy yet. Thus it is rape. There is the case of like 2 or 3 years age difference that can get tricky (i.e. 16yo gf 18yo bf) but thats not a teacher sleeping with a student. Thats adult and minor with power dynamics in play.

Imma be real, really take a hard look at your stance. I was 9 but my older cousin was sexually abusing me, I liked it in my kid brain. I even got off a few times. I wanted it and I liked who was doing it, again at the time. Does that make it less abuse? No. I was a CHILD, even if i was 14 its still not acceptable, as I am still a CHILD/MINOR. And its wrong for not just the incestrious aspect, but the fact that my older cousin was abusing me. I lost my virginity because if it. I never had the choice because I didnt know what sex was I was just told at first that we were having fun and playing as doctors. But hey I liked it and I kept going back. I guess that makes it better. Because I had a smile on my face after.

Seriously. I dont mean this to bash over your head. But your attitude/justification toward that is how more sexually fucked up people are made, I had to do a lot of work alongside GOD to heal the things that happened to me. Because what you wrote reads as no one cares about the abuse, at least you scored some.

Please just give some thought on these words.

I am not, but you can see it that way. Im saying its more than just requiring ID for porn. No one ever said they condone kids accessing porn. I even said. Parents need to do better too, instead of a government intervention, block porn from your network, block everything but the two services you use for all I care. My issue is the PRECEDENT BEING SET. not the current issue.

But apparently you dont care for the children since you think this will actually stop things. And why is wanting privacy a bad thing now? I guess governments should start requiring all gun manufactures to keep a list of who they sell to. I mean shooting people is bad right, and it can harm children. Doesn't mean anyone who visits a gun store needs to hand over their credit card and id to be put on a forever maintained list by the government. It can be easily applied then because they have the infrastructure from the way they did the porn site.

I am not saying dont do something to prevent children from accessing porn, what I am saying is it shouldn't be at the expense of the privacy of citizens. Reguardless of if you agree with the content.

So to say "you're arguing for children to be able to type a website and see a gangbang immediately" is 1. False, never claimed that, and its disgusting that you would try and put those words in my mouth because I have opinion on how it should be handled thats different than yours. Not if it is or isnt, a good thing for kids to have access to porn, which I DO NOT WANT NOR CONDONE. I just said I dont like how they implement this, and its not going to stop anything, just sets things up for government crackdown later.

2.Any power the government takes for good at the time, can later be used for bad by someone else, may be okay for now but not if socialists take over in the future for our children and their children). It not just about the good actors. But how can bad actors use this and is that use worth the risk.

3. PARENTS!!! PLEASE WATCH WHAT YOUR KIDS ARE DOING ON THE INTERNET IF THEY HAVE ACCESS. Put parental blocks on your networks. DONT TRUST THE GOVERNMENT WITH RAISING YOUR KIDS. DO IT YOURSELF!!.

Its about a precident on the internet, besides a large company being forced to store data. They will find a way to monetize it, I.E. sell that data. There are so many ways it can go. Its not about just the porn. Again it can be bypassed by a vpn so its useless in protecting kids. Almost like a 18 - 20 yo going to Mexico to drink early. Just change location.

This is about the precedent it starts. I mentioned Gun purchases, yes ID for buying, but if i browse now the Gov knows im looking into buying a gun. Anything deemed "not appropriate" on the internet could be locked behind this kind of "regulation". (Gun stores, vapping, social media, forums, anywhere where you value any form of privacy on the internet is at risk).

Even with the mention of using a credit card. So now that company has a database they must maintain indefinitely since the could be in legal issues if they dont. with all age identifying information you or others provide them, including the card potentially linking you direct to your bank account. (Don't think thats good reguardless of if its just for porn sites for now).

Also any law said to protect kids im weary of. 1. Usually if there isnt much argument to be had past that it makes me weary of it. 2. Parents should control what their kids see on the internet, it wasn't meant for kids in the first place, but also there are thinks like local network blocks and prental controls that work a million times better than this ID crap. Plus it would be harder to bypass with a vpn yo some extent.

Im not trying to fearmonger but I see where the trend is going. And in an era where we want less regulation on most things and less Gov in our lives. I dont see this as that. I dont fear even this happening but I can see the uses outside of just that one use case.

TL;DR.

It won't protect kids, it creates a precedent for future lock downs of websites on the internet, and finally its not on the Government's job to regulate your parenting, put parental controls, put a network watch/block.

Sorry for the long message. Its just i care about internet rights and privacy very much so. Any frustration is pointed at the situation, not at you fren, I just want to see more open and more free internet. We may loose it totally some day but I wanna keep fighting because thats what made all this possible.

Most likely a data base of IDs or a face scan ("ai age verification"). Or something like that. Its very invasive of privacy and gives the state a potential database of people. It won't protect kids because its bypassable with vpns and there is nothing they can do to stop that without taking full control of the internet and prying into everything you do so it ultimately is the slow erosion of freedom. (Highly doubt they will do that... for now.)

I know it sounds stupid to say thay over pornography. But if age verification becomes precedent. It can start a trend where gun stores online or other not serial but still controversial sites will need to now have a list of identifying information that the state requires they keep, so if they ask for it someday. Im sure they will just hand it over.

Edit addition: this can also be applied to social media, online stores, forums, account creation, etc. Basically the simi anonymous internet that allows people to share their opinions freely without fear of a backlash from those around them (if they choose to not share names or have an alt account), will me gone. Places like this will be even more far and few between.

Business is booming!

Always will be.

Vile, im so greateful that God pulled me from that way of life (homosexuality). I still struggle with looks and sometimes porn but im not going back to that life. And this cements it even more than it already is, looks like God's hand pulled me out of that life just in time to avoid this bullshit. Can't wait to find myself a good God fearing woman who holds me accountable, and make the leftist/lgtv "community". And when I have kids. They will be their worst nightmare haha.