Curious that you refer to an "entity," but give it no name. Plenty of ideologies and mythologies that have nothing to do with reality, which is not a sign of skepticism but of psychosis. You also confuse skepticism and curiosity as a motive for questions. No room in this description for beliefs derived from reality, instead of an independent belief system that must be "coupled" with reality.
Curious that you refer to an "entity," but give it no name.
Telling people the name is irrelevant. You can't tell people, you must show them. If you are really interested you should read my report. It isn't about telling anyone anything. It is about showing the evidence. It itself is not complete unfortunately. There are five more sections intended. They are mostly written, but these things take time, especially since my life has been rather difficult of late.
Nevertheless, what is there will give sufficient evidence of a group of people at the top of society ruling from the shadows by the methods I suggest that it at least gives an appreciation of my claims.
Plenty of ideologies and mythologies that have nothing to do with reality
I suggest ALL ideologies and mythologies are wrong. Indeed, my investigation suggests that all such things are intentionally wrong (though my investigation suggests they all use interesting elements of the truth to create their falsehoods). They do create a certain psychosis as you suggest, but the reasons are not obvious.
No room in this description for beliefs derived from reality
I'm not trying to tell you what the truth is. I don't know myself. I suggest neither do you. All I can do is show the evidence of what I've found. That evidence suggests the statements I am making. To see the beginnings of that evidence chain, I suggest you read my report.
To be fair it takes time to read. It is a body of evidence, and, as it was intentionally constructed, that body requires ALL of the evidence, in sequence, to make sense. Thus you have to begin in the beginning and read all the middle to make it to the end for the case to be debated reasonably. In addition, as stated, it's less than half way done (maybe a quarter or less). Even so, what is there is more than enough to create a solid body of evidence to the claims.
I can provide evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that both Science and History are a formal ideology and a carefully crafted myth. The single system of "Academic Knowledge" is designed and strictly controlled by the aforenamed entity.
The evidence shows not only that my claims are true, but how those false belief systems have been constructed, who has done it, for what purpose it is has been done, for what purpose it persists, and in some cases, gives some evidence of what the most important parts have been purposefully omitted, suggesting the actual reality or at least pointing in the right direction (as opposed to the false current one).
Further, if my claim is true as the evidence suggests, adhering to your beliefs and pushing your myths and histories is exactly the psychosis you accuse others of.
Well, your take on science is bullshit. It is tested all the time by the fact that we can measure reality and construct technology. Are you going to say the technology is a "carefully crafted myth"? That I can't talk to my wife while she is in Africa, or that it is not possible to get there in 24 hours?
Just because we deal with existence by way of concepts does not derogate them into "ideology," whatever you think that to mean. In order to declare that any are false, one would have to know what is true. Which by your all-inclusive definition is impossible.
What "evidence"? Write a book. Spell it out. Be ignored. If you know the truth, let us know. Tell us why jetliners can't fly and telephones can't work. That lasers can't exist, etc., etc. Either we have working technology and the ideas behind that are correct and workable by demonstration, or....what? I've seen head trips before, in college, among the enlightened, and this is no different. You might as well understand that I am a No Sale.
Curious that you refer to an "entity," but give it no name. Plenty of ideologies and mythologies that have nothing to do with reality, which is not a sign of skepticism but of psychosis. You also confuse skepticism and curiosity as a motive for questions. No room in this description for beliefs derived from reality, instead of an independent belief system that must be "coupled" with reality.
Telling people the name is irrelevant. You can't tell people, you must show them. If you are really interested you should read my report. It isn't about telling anyone anything. It is about showing the evidence. It itself is not complete unfortunately. There are five more sections intended. They are mostly written, but these things take time, especially since my life has been rather difficult of late.
Nevertheless, what is there will give sufficient evidence of a group of people at the top of society ruling from the shadows by the methods I suggest that it at least gives an appreciation of my claims.
I suggest ALL ideologies and mythologies are wrong. Indeed, my investigation suggests that all such things are intentionally wrong (though my investigation suggests they all use interesting elements of the truth to create their falsehoods). They do create a certain psychosis as you suggest, but the reasons are not obvious.
I'm not trying to tell you what the truth is. I don't know myself. I suggest neither do you. All I can do is show the evidence of what I've found. That evidence suggests the statements I am making. To see the beginnings of that evidence chain, I suggest you read my report.
To be fair it takes time to read. It is a body of evidence, and, as it was intentionally constructed, that body requires ALL of the evidence, in sequence, to make sense. Thus you have to begin in the beginning and read all the middle to make it to the end for the case to be debated reasonably. In addition, as stated, it's less than half way done (maybe a quarter or less). Even so, what is there is more than enough to create a solid body of evidence to the claims.
I'm content with science and history.
I can provide evidence, beyond a reasonable doubt, that both Science and History are a formal ideology and a carefully crafted myth. The single system of "Academic Knowledge" is designed and strictly controlled by the aforenamed entity.
The evidence shows not only that my claims are true, but how those false belief systems have been constructed, who has done it, for what purpose it is has been done, for what purpose it persists, and in some cases, gives some evidence of what the most important parts have been purposefully omitted, suggesting the actual reality or at least pointing in the right direction (as opposed to the false current one).
Further, if my claim is true as the evidence suggests, adhering to your beliefs and pushing your myths and histories is exactly the psychosis you accuse others of.
Well, your take on science is bullshit. It is tested all the time by the fact that we can measure reality and construct technology. Are you going to say the technology is a "carefully crafted myth"? That I can't talk to my wife while she is in Africa, or that it is not possible to get there in 24 hours?
Just because we deal with existence by way of concepts does not derogate them into "ideology," whatever you think that to mean. In order to declare that any are false, one would have to know what is true. Which by your all-inclusive definition is impossible.
What "evidence"? Write a book. Spell it out. Be ignored. If you know the truth, let us know. Tell us why jetliners can't fly and telephones can't work. That lasers can't exist, etc., etc. Either we have working technology and the ideas behind that are correct and workable by demonstration, or....what? I've seen head trips before, in college, among the enlightened, and this is no different. You might as well understand that I am a No Sale.