In the same way that A.I. can reach conclusions from a situational standpoint when given specified information and backgrounds of individuals, their locations, motives etc., it directly mimics what we have been told and have learned about Project Looking Glass.
Like most technology, we the people get it last, while the military makes it and uses it first. Just like the Q posts and their situational planning of this long-term operation.
Remember the Project Looking Glass video from the past? The interviewee states that the bad guys didn't know how to use it, when they had it in their possession. The reason for that is simple. The bad guys can't situationally plan for their immorality and illegality against morality and legality. Just like they can't make memes. It's the same philosophy, with the same outcome.
Now, the good guys have had this technology in their possession for a long time and they are using it against the Deep State, while also allowing us to do the same.
The MCAS software that killed two planeloads of people was completely uncontrolled. It didn't pretend to be a person. Every fire-and-forget guided missile is an "autonomous entity."
Maybe "limited mission autonomous entity" is the most accurate description of typical known missiles and similar systems. And for non weapons like aircraft avionics, pray that the main programmed mission is to keep everyone alive and avoid controlled flight into terrain.
Not the case for MCAS. The only programmed mission was to prevent a stall-inducing pitch angle, even if it meant overriding the pilots and flying the plane into the ground. Passengers? Airplane? Not relevant considerations. Faulty design? Yes. There are people responsible, but no one accountable.
I worked in the area of artificial perception. Above that is a towering mountain to be climbed in order to produce an artificial mind. A.I. is not it.