For anyone else wanting to read further. Would also explain why Indians fought for the south without owning any slaves. History makes the south out to be big slave owners. At the height of slavery only 1.6% of the population owned slaves. Yet the south came together because of:
The victors write the history books, and you read them.
That is such a pat answer. Who says so? Prove it. And then prove that the history books are false. You've run out of argument.
You've run out of critical thinking skills due to your biases.
https://greatawakening.win/p/19BtGVIryw/q1957-buy-a-history-book-publish/c/
And you've run out of argument, throwing other things at me. All you have left are insults. I've got plenty of old history books. And family history,
For anyone else wanting to read further. Would also explain why Indians fought for the south without owning any slaves. History makes the south out to be big slave owners. At the height of slavery only 1.6% of the population owned slaves. Yet the south came together because of:
https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states