Abe suspended habeas corpus, he didn't want free speech or the press to .. freely speak, weird..
He had no congressional authority to go to war.
3- ignored all constitutional provisions for state's rights..
And in doing so he broke the constitution allowing for an overpowered fed .. weird .. look where we're at currently.
The south, I'm having trouble finding anything on a violation. Our founding documents say we have the power to overthrow a tyrannical government, which, oddly, has existed since Abe.
All the complaints about Lincoln would not have occurred without the breaking of War by the South. So far as he knew, he was quelling an insurrection and already had the authority to enforce the Constitution. But you are blaming the victim, since the South struck first.
The South committed rebellion and sedition by their violation of union under the Constitution. And a third of its population was enslaved. For you, that is no big deal. You don't see massive slavery as a "tyrannical government." That is a bit nearsighted. Your continued reluctance to face that issue is bad optics for you.
It's well documented Abe took over Sumter with aggression.
Abe himself said it was to collect taxes, but really it was to piss in some faces to create a war congress never would have approved. The biggest type of snake. Wanting the south to pay taxes to help pay for the lobbyists that got him elected.
The site for Sumter had been ceded by South Carolina in 1836, 24 years before Lincoln became President. It was a federal construction for the U.S. Army, which had several forts on that shore. How can Lincoln "take over" a fort that was federal to begin with? You are not making sense, or simply misunderstand the history of events.
Since the presence and plan for the Fort predated Lincoln, how was it then his plan to use it to collect taxes? When it hadn't even been completed at the outbreak of war?
Abe suspended habeas corpus, he didn't want free speech or the press to .. freely speak, weird..
He had no congressional authority to go to war.
3- ignored all constitutional provisions for state's rights..
And in doing so he broke the constitution allowing for an overpowered fed .. weird .. look where we're at currently.
The south, I'm having trouble finding anything on a violation. Our founding documents say we have the power to overthrow a tyrannical government, which, oddly, has existed since Abe.
All the complaints about Lincoln would not have occurred without the breaking of War by the South. So far as he knew, he was quelling an insurrection and already had the authority to enforce the Constitution. But you are blaming the victim, since the South struck first.
The South committed rebellion and sedition by their violation of union under the Constitution. And a third of its population was enslaved. For you, that is no big deal. You don't see massive slavery as a "tyrannical government." That is a bit nearsighted. Your continued reluctance to face that issue is bad optics for you.
It's well documented Abe took over Sumter with aggression.
Abe himself said it was to collect taxes, but really it was to piss in some faces to create a war congress never would have approved. The biggest type of snake. Wanting the south to pay taxes to help pay for the lobbyists that got him elected.
The site for Sumter had been ceded by South Carolina in 1836, 24 years before Lincoln became President. It was a federal construction for the U.S. Army, which had several forts on that shore. How can Lincoln "take over" a fort that was federal to begin with? You are not making sense, or simply misunderstand the history of events.
Since the presence and plan for the Fort predated Lincoln, how was it then his plan to use it to collect taxes? When it hadn't even been completed at the outbreak of war?