The injunction against graven images was against objects of worship, not against representational art.
The better translation of Luke 17:21 is "the kingdom of God is in your midst." Which was Jesus himself, right there in front of them.
If you think people believe graven images make a place holy, you don't understand them at all. They are not as stupid as you imagine them to be. But you seem to specialize in thinking your imagination is reality.
I never said anything about satanic anything. You're projecting out of ignorance.
EDIT: Deleted my shared observation (it was just an observation) and responses that ensued for the simple reason that misunderstandings have resulted in less than Christ like energy in this thread. So I decided to delete it for that reason alone.
The injunction against graven images was against objects of worship, not against representational art.
The better translation of Luke 17:21 is "the kingdom of God is in your midst." Which was Jesus himself, right there in front of them.
If you think people believe graven images make a place holy, you don't understand them at all. They are not as stupid as you imagine them to be. But you seem to specialize in thinking your imagination is reality.
Youβre literally looking at the doors to a church. If you choose to believe that itβs satanic, then you do you.
It's just a building...
The "church" is the people...
I never said anything about satanic anything. You're projecting
out of ignorance.EDIT: Deleted my shared observation (it was just an observation) and responses that ensued for the simple reason that misunderstandings have resulted in less than Christ like energy in this thread. So I decided to delete it for that reason alone.
Nah, you deleted it because you realized that you were being an ass because people didnβt agree with your assessment of a piece of art.
How very Christian of you...