I think it's great that some space telescope or some moon orbiter can see the "landing sites" but at the end of the day, we're trusting the same people who said we went there
What is happening here is questioning in bad faith. You are simply refusing to accept any evidence on grounds of distrusting the source (without giving reason) or discrediting the evidence as being fake (without giving proof). I would like to know at what point you would agree that we went to the Moon. What evidence would be indisputable to you?
I looked it up. You are right; I relent. But they can be seen and photographed by lunar orbiters and that has happened. Here is Apollo 11 as seen by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter in 2009: https://skyandtelescope.org/astronomy-news/apollo-landers-seen-on-the-moon/ You are welcome.
I think it's great that some space telescope or some moon orbiter can see the "landing sites" but at the end of the day, we're trusting the same people who said we went there
"This NASA picture proves that NASA is telling the truth"
😆😆
No, you are just denying evidence. There are plenty of confirmations from non-NASA sources: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings
What is happening here is questioning in bad faith. You are simply refusing to accept any evidence on grounds of distrusting the source (without giving reason) or discrediting the evidence as being fake (without giving proof). I would like to know at what point you would agree that we went to the Moon. What evidence would be indisputable to you?