When AI is gobbling up nonsense from other AIs into its LLM data sets ...
And therein lies the problem -- and will ALWAYS be the problem.
WHO decides WHICH datasets are "correct?"
No computer can ever do that, which means it will ALWAYS come back to the FACT that a computer will be PROGRAMMED by a human -- who may or may not be honest or honorable, and will NEVER have enough knowledge to know which datasets should be accepted or rejected.
The AI will just spit out what some human told it to spit out, thus making "artifical intelligence" an oxymoron.
Human intelligence is enough of a problem already, and artificial intelligence is an impossibility.
Moreover, with scumbags like Sam Altman using their unjustly inflated ego to lie about what is really possible, we get a "tyranny of the 'expert'" problem -- just like the liars during the Covid scam.
And therein lies the problem -- and will ALWAYS be the problem.
WHO decides WHICH datasets are "correct?"
No computer can ever do that, which means it will ALWAYS come back to the FACT that a computer will be PROGRAMMED by a human -- who may or may not be honest or honorable, and will NEVER have enough knowledge to know which datasets should be accepted or rejected.
The AI will just spit out what some human told it to spit out, thus making "artifical intelligence" an oxymoron.
Human intelligence is enough of a problem already, and artificial intelligence is an impossibility.
Moreover, with scumbags like Sam Altman using their unjustly inflated ego to lie about what is really possible, we get a "tyranny of the 'expert'" problem -- just like the liars during the Covid scam.