That guest was awful! He waffled around a lot of truth issues without ever fully explaining or supporting them. Then he shits on the Q research movement more than once. And to wrap a pretty bow on his sporadic diatribe he defends college bloat and endowments while segway into praise about his son who is a high ranking CFR employee....
That guest oozes black hat three letter 4am talking points and faggotry.
Agreed, and I did the same. I listened to the whole interview while driving to and from work and was just absolutely disgusted halfway through when I figured out the guest was trying to gate-keep information while implanting narratives on the litany of subjects that popped up.... which was another yuge tell IMO:
The guy literally speaks like one of the paytriot sophists. Paraphrased: "let me bring up A,B,C...X,Y,Z... establish the subject, then switch to another adjacent subject without going into substance or context beyond what I'm trying to establish" which for the most part was roping. LET ME ROPE YOU IN.... then I'm going to push the points I want to make e.g. defend Pfizer while throwing Fauxi under the bus, shit on Q and anons, prop up elite college funding, and while I'm at it glorify the CFR
By the end of it I was convinced this old kook sounded a lot like Juan O Conman. He was peddling sophistry while pulling the fugazi blanket over the audience's head.
That guest was awful! He waffled around a lot of truth issues without ever fully explaining or supporting them. Then he shits on the Q research movement more than once. And to wrap a pretty bow on his sporadic diatribe he defends college bloat and endowments while segway into praise about his son who is a high ranking CFR employee....
That guest oozes black hat three letter 4am talking points and faggotry.
Agreed, and I did the same. I listened to the whole interview while driving to and from work and was just absolutely disgusted halfway through when I figured out the guest was trying to gate-keep information while implanting narratives on the litany of subjects that popped up.... which was another yuge tell IMO:
The guy literally speaks like one of the paytriot sophists. Paraphrased: "let me bring up A,B,C...X,Y,Z... establish the subject, then switch to another adjacent subject without going into substance or context beyond what I'm trying to establish" which for the most part was roping. LET ME ROPE YOU IN.... then I'm going to push the points I want to make e.g. defend Pfizer while throwing Fauxi under the bus, shit on Q and anons, prop up elite college funding, and while I'm at it glorify the CFR
By the end of it I was convinced this old kook sounded a lot like Juan O Conman. He was peddling sophistry while pulling the fugazi blanket over the audience's head.