The hoax began in the early 1970's when the plan to take the towers down and blame it on Islam was conceived.
The NO PLANES hoax began years after the 9/11 Truthers had already done a whole lot of research into just what happened. There were planes. Just not the airliners that took off. They landed (emptied) and were replaced by remote control drones and loaded with explosives (napalm). The original planes were not
taken out of service for several years. Someone forgot!
Technically there were no real planes that crashed into anything. I saw a long deleted video by John Lear of Lear jet fame on how the outgoing planes had their signals switched over to the incoming missiles so it would appear that the planes turned around and flew into their targets. But the early videos I saw, when slowed down, show a planes flying right into the towers like a knife going into butter. It looked like any Hollywood production. The footage at the pentagon does not show a drone… just a swoosh. There is not a plane or drone part anywhere that I have ever seen. Your idea of drones with missiles at least doesn’t just go with the story that planes flew into these buildings. If Tucker or others keep pushing that narrative, we will be no closer to the truth.
If you watch Codex 9/11, you'll see that there is a very strong case that, in fact, remotely controlled drone planes (probably 737s) took over the flight paths of the airliners, that these were then diverted and the drones flown into the towers.
The Pentagon narrative doesn't include any real footage of the incoming missile/drone/?, despite there being cameras everywhere. The footage only shows an explosion.
I find it curious that Tucker is coming out with this exactly at the time that Brad Zerba's amazing documentary was premiered and released.
The hoax began in the early 1970's when the plan to take the towers down and blame it on Islam was conceived.
The NO PLANES hoax began years after the 9/11 Truthers had already done a whole lot of research into just what happened. There were planes. Just not the airliners that took off. They landed (emptied) and were replaced by remote control drones and loaded with explosives (napalm). The original planes were not taken out of service for several years. Someone forgot!
Technically there were no real planes that crashed into anything. I saw a long deleted video by John Lear of Lear jet fame on how the outgoing planes had their signals switched over to the incoming missiles so it would appear that the planes turned around and flew into their targets. But the early videos I saw, when slowed down, show a planes flying right into the towers like a knife going into butter. It looked like any Hollywood production. The footage at the pentagon does not show a drone… just a swoosh. There is not a plane or drone part anywhere that I have ever seen. Your idea of drones with missiles at least doesn’t just go with the story that planes flew into these buildings. If Tucker or others keep pushing that narrative, we will be no closer to the truth.
If you watch Codex 9/11, you'll see that there is a very strong case that, in fact, remotely controlled drone planes (probably 737s) took over the flight paths of the airliners, that these were then diverted and the drones flown into the towers.
The Pentagon narrative doesn't include any real footage of the incoming missile/drone/?, despite there being cameras everywhere. The footage only shows an explosion.
I find it curious that Tucker is coming out with this exactly at the time that Brad Zerba's amazing documentary was premiered and released.
Codex 9/11 https://rumble.com/v6xtnzu-codex-911-premiering-aug-24th-6pm-et.html
What you saw was NOT A HOLOGRAM but (CGI) COMPUTER GENERATED IMAGERY added after the fact.