Probably not a summary the study authors would agree with.
Some other factors to consider:
*They excluded folks who already had cancer: "Only the subjects who were admitted for the above cancers for the first time afterthe follow-up start were considered as new cases."
The unvaccinated cohort was much smaller and younger: "A markedly younger age was observed among the unvaccinated (mean 45.1±19.7 years), compared to the subjects who re-ceived at least three vaccine dose (mean 53.0±20.0 years; p<0.001; Student's t-test for unpaired samples) or at least one dose (mean 50.2±20.5 years; p<0.001"
I'd be hesitant to draw any conclusions at all from this as that five year difference is critical. 45-50 you see a bigtime health breakdown in folks.
https://files.catbox.moe/ay6t84.pdf
Probably not a summary the study authors would agree with.
Some other factors to consider:
*They excluded folks who already had cancer: "Only the subjects who were admitted for the above cancers for the first time afterthe follow-up start were considered as new cases."
I'd be hesitant to draw any conclusions at all from this as that five year difference is critical. 45-50 you see a bigtime health breakdown in folks.