Here's the problem a lot of people have when interpreting Q and the movement behind it: They attempt to characterize Q as a "leader" of a movement, when Q is merely an informant to Anons and those willing to dig.
This gives the fuel to the fire that its a "cult" rather than a "digital identity". They then use this across media to give everyone the impression that we are "conspiracy theorists", that CIA plugged title that distances others from discovering the content.
Yes, Q is letting us in on the CONSPIRACY, but nothing presented by Q is a THEORY. There is no "belief" in Q, its factual and real information, there is no sense of theology or worship to it. Belief is in GOD, and Q supports this.
But see, I think Trump is doing something brilliant here. He is embracing that image that others have of Q (specifically knowing what we know, he is possibly Q+), as a litmus test to see who is willing to actually dig and who is going to keep dismissing it. Its an amazing pulse check of the intellect of the populace.
Here's the problem a lot of people have when interpreting Q and the movement behind it: They attempt to characterize Q as a "leader" of a movement, when Q is merely an informant to Anons and those willing to dig.
This gives the fuel to the fire that its a "cult" rather than a "digital identity". They then use this across media to give everyone the impression that we are "conspiracy theorists", that CIA plugged title that distances others from discovering the content.
Yes, Q is letting us in on the CONSPIRACY, but nothing presented by Q is a THEORY. There is no "belief" in Q, its factual and real information, there is no sense of theology or worship to it. Belief is in GOD, and Q supports this.
But see, I think Trump is doing something brilliant here. He is embracing that image that others have of Q (specifically knowing what we know, he is possibly Q+), as a litmus test to see who is willing to actually dig and who is going to keep dismissing it. Its an amazing pulse check of the intellect of the populace.