Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® 21h
BREAKING: First Population-Wide Study Finds COVID-19 "Vaccines" Increase Risk of Multiple Cancers
Official government data from nearly 300,000 people tracked for 30 months show mRNA shots significantly increase the risk of overall cancer, breast
(twitter.com)
🚔 Crime & ClotShots 💸
Precisely. Your shift in understanding occurs when you recognize that excessive cortisol production is THE RESULT of ones SUSTAINED DISCORDANT FEELINGS.... a.k.a. RESISTANCE. Most pointedly, the chemical/hormone/enzyme or "genetic mutation" is NOT THE CAUSE of the dis-ease/disorder.
Our body is always talking to us. When we feel stress and anxiety, something FEELS wrong/bad/off in our lives. This is what needs to be addressed. If one cannot bring themselves to extricate themselves from this situation immediately, be it a job, relationship, circumstance, efforts must be made to see things in a different way.
Perhaps one of the best ways to think of all this is the flowing of a river. When we're happy, healthy and harmonious, we are "in the flow". When we slip into resistance, we are "fighting the current" or "clinging to the rocks", and this results in stress, anxiety, and all the other "out of the flow" emotions.
The fundamental esoteric teaching on this topic of "seemingly intractable circumstances" is to simply spend time each day "allowing everything to be as it is". In other words, to "call off the fight", stop trying, efforting, struggling to "fix it". This practice alone allows you to slip back into the flow, if only for those few minutes.
It is within this flow where the "solution" exists and ultimately arises. Perhaps first it occurs to you "I got myself into these circumstances, therefore I can get myself out of them". This realization alone can bring tremendous RELIEF which is what anybody struggling with stress and anxiety is ultimately looking for. You once again feel EMPOWERED.
The very simple way to look at all this is: If you want to feel good (which is what we all want), you first have to choose to feel good. This means "calling off the fight" ultimately.
The psyche, regulator of all our bodily processes, totally unaware of "time", will in turn stop generating excess cortisol in the periods you are "allowing everything to be as it is". The psyche is producing the excess cortisol to assist you, quite literally, with FIGHTING your perceived literal or figurative adversary. It has a very primitive outlook in this sense, effectively "basic survival" awareness.
Make sense? Questions?
No questions yet. Need to digest.
Referring back to what you first posted about the "belief shapers." Came across this article about the impossibility of the mRNA platform, Malone's claim to fame. Thought you might find it interesting.
Ah yes, great article. Scoglio did great work on both the spike protein and nanotech fairytiles before his death. The author does a great job of highlighting the "elephants in the room" that Scoglio had pointed out. I followed his work, along with Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr Tom Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, Sam and Mark Bailey closely almost from the start of COVID.
Another less known, but equally important figure was a microbiologist from England named Harold Hillman. He did most of his pioneering work in the 1970s and 1980s. In short, he stated most of the things about cells and neurons we all ASSUME TO BE TRUE are anything but. Namely, the cellular organelles we all learned about in high school biology. Hillman said all but the nucleus and mitochondria are effectively either "air bubbles" or "staining artifacts" caused by the required preparation for electron microscopy.
Most importantly, Hillman also pointed out that there was no such thing, LITERALLY, as a "cell receptor". This point alone totally destroys the entire boogeyman-virus narrative right alongside the spike protein nonsense. Because, allegedly, these fictional "cell receptors" are what get "tricked" into allowing the virus or protein into the cell.
What's amazing is, nobody has ever actually SEEN a cell receptor, and of course, no "viruses tricking one" and entering a cell. It's all a gigantic fairy tale.
Hillman issued about 50 questions to the scientific community at large back in the 1980s, and to this day, none have been answered or addressed. The reason for this is quite obvious of course. When the controlling cabal can't "debunk" something, they suppress and ignore it.
I've gone one step further than Hillman, leveraging the work of Antoine BeChamp and Gaston Naessans work with bacteria. Both of these men identified something BeChamp called a "Microzyma" and Naessans called a "Somatid" as the progenitor to all bacteria. Naessans went further with modern dark field microscopy by showing all bacteria begin from this "spore" and eventually return to being it when their job is complete. BeChamp showed these tiny spores were effectively indestructible, impervious to extreme heat and cold.
I have concluded that these microzyma/somatids are actually the BASIC UNIT OF LIFE....not the "cell". Within the cellular membrane are one or more "mitochondria" which are individual microzyma/somatids. And the nucleus is a group of cooperating somatids. The two primary "cellular organelles" that actually do exist, are actually this one "thing".
You can think of these "spores" as quite literally "stem cells", albeit they aren't "cells", they are the microzyma/somatid which can become a liver cell, an eyeball cell, a neuron, a bacteria, or dare I stretch my speculation too far, a "parasite" as well.
From the metaphysical perspective, we could call these spores a "Consciousness Unit" with equal precision. Within them are the instructions necessary in generating any and all "forms of life".
I admit this is all my personal, abstract speculation. I am not a trained scientist and don't have a lab full of equipment to draw these conclusions. I have simply drawn these, what I think are rather obvious conclusions once I realized we're being lied to about practically everything else.
I think life, nature and "reality" are quite simple to understand once you leave behind all the endless lies and deceptions we were taught. I've done several pieces on the fraud of Einstein, Bohr, Shroddinger showing their relativity, particle physics and quantum mechanics are all fraudulent as well. When the aether was killed by Einsteinism in the 1930s, it opened the door for all this deception.
One more thing worth noting, if you're familiar with HOW we're told DNA?RNA is made, via "transcription" within the cell but then realize Hillman said the "endoplasmic reticulum (ER)", "golgi complex" and "ribosomes" are all staining artifacts or air bubbles...and don't actually exist, this further annihilates both the boogyeman-virus story as well as the spike protein story. Because "DNA/RNA transcription" RELIES UPON the "jobs" these fictional cellular organelles are said to perform!
I've yet to see any definitive explanations as to exactly what this DNA/RNA "stuff" is. It appears obvious that it is some sort of unique identifier as per all the criminal forensics and paternity cases that at least have the appearance of legitimacy. That being said, I'm highly skeptical now as these things can also be easily manipulated. The whole "double helix" story is also a gigantic fairy tale, as Watson's "swinger" wife, an art professor at Oxford, just "drew something cool" one day and Watson and Crick decided it was a good a representation as any for their hypothetical DNA. To wit, there's only one known "photograph" of DNA, taken in 2013 I believe, which is just a grainy image of nothing more than "what they say is DNA'. Which could very well be the same thing as their alleged photographs of boogeyman-viruses.
One of the scientific researchers explained the whole process of "extracting DNA/RNA" from a sample which is littered with the addition of various chemicals, precursors, enzymes etc. to get the "final product". He made a great analogy, saying the DNA extraction process is kind of like somebody burning a piece of wood, after which concluding wood's primary components are smoke and ash.
Anyway, thanks for sharing the article. It was right up my alley and the author was a good writer as an added bonus!
As to all my other ramblings, yes, take your time. I dumped a lot on you, as I regularly do now. Time is speeding up and the controlling cabal is pulling out all their stops these days. The days of "sugar-coating" things are behind us as we're seeing here in GAW more and more.
As to the "belief shapers", yes, this is what the highest ranking cabal members are involved with. As the author pointed out, the people still locked into the mainstream narratives are trapped in hundreds of beliefs, assumptions, presumptions and speculation that are treated as "facts" by mainstream academia. They can't see the forest for the trees. I like to tell people, "can you start your investigation with only what you personally know for sure is true?". With a modicum of effort in this direction, you'll find out there are actually very few "facts" or "truths" in this world, because "this world" isn't the "material construct" we've been deceptively led to believe it is.
The "outer/material/physical" world is a temporary REFLECTION of human BELIEFS, both individually and collectively. In this sense, it's "old news", an 'after-effect" of ACTUAL REALITY. Actual reality is purely metaphysical, molded and formed by our thoughts, feelings, beliefs, imagination and dreams - these are what are REAL to all of us. These are the "architects" of the "outer reality". Our genes, enzymes, hormones, etc. are merely the resulting temporary EXPRESSION of our current BELIEFS. When you change your beliefs, you change the reflection presented to you by the outer, physical reality.
A lot to chew on. Take your time!
Tally Ho!
I picked up Hillman's, The Living Cell based on comments by Tom Cowan. Haven't dived into his stuff to the degree you have, however. You have the same weakness I do, you like discovering something is a lie, and has been your entire life. I'm right with you on Einstein, but haven't considered his contemporaries. A big one for me at the moment is nuclear explosions, something no power plant has ever done. They melt, but don't blow up.
hahaha, I don't know if "I like discovering a lie" so much, but I do like the sensation of feeling liberated and free when I do.
You may not be a fan of the "flat earth" movement. I have my own thoughts about it which diverge from both sides, but I know it's a "taboo topic" here. The guy who first exploded the movement some 15-odd years ago was Eric Dubay. He's quite a strange character, leaves a lot to be desired. However, he's bright and insightful regardless. He did a video on nukes just yesterday that was pretty good.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cgCwZNTKIE
I can't say for sure "nukes don't exist". All I can say for sure is, I've seen no evidence that they do. I've read a couple books on the whole Hiroshima and Nagasaki aftermath as well that lays those frauds out pretty clearly.
Quantum mechanics, as presented by mainstream academia, is an "overlay model" of the truth. They effectively took octaves, tones, frequencies (vibrations) and transformed them into fraudulent particles - proton, neutron, electron. This is "why it works" when you do the math. You couldn't talk one in a million "particle physicists" out of what they believe because their model "mathematically works".
The guy who really blew everything wide open on this was a sculptor named Walter Russell and his book "The Universal One". It's one of the most difficult reads I've ever made. Sometimes it can take hours to get through a page or two. Anyway, Tesla thought the book was "genius" but way before it's time. On her deathbed, Russell's wife Lao said he was visited by "a representative of the Vatican" and encouraged to stop publishing his book and stop teaching physics professors at universities how to find more undiscovered "elements". His book went out of print almost as fast as it went into print. Only in the last five or so years has it come back into print.
Anyway, Russell was basically saying everything is vibrational in nature, that there was only one force (electromagnetism), moving in opposite directions as the creative and destructive. In short, we live in a giant sea of "aether", which is of course what Tesla, Heaviside, Steinmetz, Maxwell, etc. all supported before Einstein's wife and her propaganda team came along.
Tesla and Russell were the real scientists of that era. Just as Dr. Hamer is the real health expert, Hillman the most honest biologist, etc.