Much of the world's turmoil finds its origin in Darwin and the reulting scam foisted on humanity: evolution.
Removing God as the creator and author of life eliminates the moral foundation that society is built upon. James Perloff, in his book "Tornado in a Junkyard", recounts how many murderous tyrants like Hitler, Stalin and Mao, were heavily influenced by Darwins book, and if evolution is true, then weaker and "inferior" people must be eliminated.
We need to pray that Darwin and evolution are fully removed from all teaching institutions.
I would try to separate scientific hypotheses from accusations of sociological wrongdoing. Just as “darwinism” can be blamed for ethnic cleansing, we can blame the jewish Bolsheviks’ slaughter of millions of Russian and Ukrainian gentiles on the jewish supremacist notion that they think is biblical of being the “Chosen People”. Like we should be doing to debunk the concept of “hate crimes”, focus on the actions and not the supposed beliefs.
When I was younger I figured that macroevolution was a step function where each step was a beneficial mutation that took hold among a large enough percentage of a species’ population. My intuition suggested that the supposed 4 billion year age of the earth might not have been enough time for the function to have enough steps between single celled organisms and the human brain. I didn’t have the mathematical tools or genetic knowledge to calculate and articulate properly this suspicion and I acquiesced to the idea that very slight changes in genetic code can have huge physical manifestations thus reducing the number of steps needed, as well as the idea that mutations are more common than many would assume, which would also accelerate the process.
Vox Day (Mr. Beale) has been doing some interesting work on this topic, calculating rates of fixation (a mutation taking hold in a population) and considering them in the context of the practicalities of physical reproduction and generational spans. He has integrated AI into his research and calculations and has put garden variety darwinists on their heels. It’s difficult to “prove” one way or another the past that none of us were around to witness, but pay attention to his line of inquiry.
That being said, the concepts of macroevolution and intelligent design are not mutually exclusive. God could have started it all with the gift of DNA that makes life forms adaptable. The biblical creation story is at least partly figurative, allegorical, or semantic. Humans define a day as a rotation of the earth, but what is a day to God, especially before He created the earth and its rotation?
In the same passage we see two different definitions of “day”: one of them a time unit, and the other a synonym for ‘light’. God’s time unit of a “day” might be much longer than ours.
A summary of the sequence of Genesis:
In terms of life forms, it goes non-animal (vegetation), then marine animals and birds, then land animals, and then humans. Similar to an evolution chart. Or maybe God made other life forms profoundly adaptable but made humans differently with souls and made them physically pretty much how they are now from their beginning. Or maybe something in between, with allowances for micro evolution. I don’t know, but we can see huge differences in human populations due to breeding.
The parts in the Bible about ‘this one begat that one’ are to illustrate the lineage and generations leading up to Jesus. Why did Jesus come to earth after that specific number of generations? Why not a generation earlier, or many generations earlier? One answer is that the timing fulfilled prophecy, but that’s kind of circular reasoning, as we can ask why that number of generations were prophesied in the first place. How was time involved in humans being ready to replace the Mosaic law of “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” with Jesus’ more forgiving Golden Rule? Did humans need a certain number of generations to progress to this higher level of morality? Did their brains need to evolve to understand it?