One of the biggest disservices our Founding Fathers did was NOT banning Islam here in our own country
I agree. Islam is an underhanded scheme to take over the world by fraud, deceit, and violence, and NOT a true religion.
ANY group that denies the brotherhood of Man -- that opposes and actively violates Jesus' commandment to love one another -- is anti-life and a danger to civilized society.
Jesus is not the only religious leader to tell followers to love their fellow humans, of course. Other religions teach the same need for love and compassion -- and so does Islam -- but Islam negates that by ALSO teaching the need for Muslims to FORCE Islam on everyone else, including by force and violence.
John: 13:34
A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.
13:35
By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have love one to another.
You are either a liar or incredibly misled. I am gonna need you to produce receipts here are just some of mine-
. Jesus Himself Testified to a Global Mission
• John 3:16 – “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.”
👉 Not Israel alone — the world.
• John 10:16 – “I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.”
👉 Jesus foresaw Gentiles (non-Israelites) being gathered to Him.
⸻
The Great Commission
• Matthew 28:19–20 – “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you.”
👉 Jesus commands the Gospel to go to all nations.
• Acts 1:8 – “You will be my witnesses in Jerusalem, and in all Judea and Samaria, and to the ends of the earth.”
👉 The mission expands outward, not inward.
⸻
The Apostolic Witness
• Acts 10:34–35 (Peter with Cornelius, a Gentile): “I now realize how true it is that God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation the one who fears Him and does what is right.”
👉 The Holy Spirit falls on Gentiles — proof Christ’s salvation is for all.
• Romans 10:12–13 – “There is no difference between Jew and Gentile—the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on Him, for ‘Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.’”
• Galatians 3:28–29 – “There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus. If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”
👉 The covenant family is expanded to all who are in Christ. Unless you are actually willing to claim you rather than the apostle Paul are correct? Are you making THAT claim? Can you match his record of miraculous intervention and acts in the name of Christ? Or of any of the multitude of Believers that have followed? If not then I suggest you put down your poor translations garbage argument and recognize you are not playing a game. You are potentially misleading souls and THAT has consequences even if you don’t believe in them. Ye shall know the truth and it shall set you free.
I could just tell you to go fuck yourself, but where would that get us?
Let's put the insults aside, and have a civil debate and discussion about what the Bible actually says, if possible.
Most Christians today have fallen into the trap of believing the DOCTRINES of the denominational churches and NOT the Bible itself.
MOST will simply listen to or read what a DOCTRINE says, and not actually try to read and understand the BIBLE ITSELF.
90% or more of the people attending church on Sunday really do not understand the Bible, and MOST of that is the fault of the preachers and their FALSE doctrines.
That's because the preachers do EXACTLY what you just did: take one little snippet from a verse of the Bible and claim it has a particular meaning, without ANY CONTEXT to validate it.
The churches have created THEIR OWN BIBLE(S), in a sense, via their doctrines, which in many cases are NOT accurate.
And yes, there are many false translations in our modern English versions of the Bible.
John 3:16 --
Many people want to point to this ONE verse in the Bible as the holy grail -- the ONE verse that TRUMPS all other biblical versus. But let's put it into perspective. It is only ONE verse, and it MUST be construed within the overall context of the ENTIRE Bible, not just this one passage standing alone to "prove" something.
To understand the Bible, we must consider how the people who wrote it lived and experienced the "world" at that time. Just like understanding the Constitution requires us to understand what the Founding Fathers meant, we need to understand the Greeks at the time the New Testament books were written.
The word "world" in English is translated from several Greek words. One of them means the Greco-Roman geographic territory that the people of that time understood as the "world."
They knew about the Middle East (as we call it today), because that is where they lived. They knew about north Africa and part of Europe and part of near Asia, but they did not know much beyond that, and did not know of any "people" beyond their immediate area.
The people living in this "world" that they knew were mostly White. The blacks were still in Africa, the Asians in far east Asia, etc.
As I said previously, Paul wrote ALL of his letters to his FELLOW Israelites (in Europe), and none to anyone else -- because they were not known to him, and were not a part of this new thing called Christianity.
Another Greek word that has been translated into "world" in English actually means something more close to "society." It is not a geographic term, but a social term.
This is "our world" or "our society." It's that kind of idea.
When it comes to the Constitution, the government was founded and organized by the White men of America. The Indians played no part and were outside the scope of "America" in the governmental sense.
Likewise, the blacks were mostly slaves, and the few blacks who were free also played no role. So, when the Preamble says, "... our Posterity," it is not talking about anyone who is not a part of "us" or "our."
The Bible was written by men who lived in a time and place where the White man lived in the "world," both in terms of the geographic territory and the society -- the "world" that they knew.
By the time of Jesus, there were also non-Whites there, such as Canaanites and Edomites (ancestors to modern-day Jews), but they looked more or less white, as well. There were no Africans, Chinese, etc. living where Jesus was.
This is why Jesus often spoke to the "multitudes." They were all the various people living in Judea, not just the Israelites who were still there.
"World" to them was the geographic territory AND society of the Israelites, for whom the Bible was written in the first place.
Remember, God promised that the Israelites would inherit the Earth -- ONLY the Israelites. The others were not a factor in the big picture story of the Bible, other than various mentions of how they interfered with the Israelites.
1 Kings 8:53 --
For thou didst separate them [Israelites] from among all the people of the earth, to be thine inheritance, as thou spakest by the hand of Moses thy servant, when thou broughtest our fathers out of Egypt, O Lord God.
And later, Matthew 15:24 --
I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
Jesus did not come to Earth for everyone. Said so himself.
The Israelites were the "world" that Christ came to save.
He came SPECIFICALLY to save the Israelites from sin by sacrificing Himself because The Law required DEATH for many sins, and the Israelites just could not live up to it. But The Law still REQUIRED the death penalty, so Jesus took the "bullet" for all Israelites, so that in the future their death penalty was already paid.
They were still not supposed to sin, but now any sin would be accounted for in Heaven, rather than the death penalty.
Matthew 5:17 & 19 --
17 Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
19 Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
That was His primary, though not only purpose.
The phrase "only begotten son" also needs to be examined. We are told elsewhere in the Bible that Adam is the "son of God," and that the children of Israel are the "children of God."
This seems to be another contradiction. Is "only begotten son" translated accurately in John 3:16?
In Hebrews 11:17, Isaac is called Abraham's "only begotten son," even though Ishmael was also Abraham's' son.
By faith Abraham, when he was tried, offered up Isaac: and he that had received the promises offered up his only begotten son,
What gives? How can someone have an ONLY begotten son, when he has more than one son?
Does the phrase mean something the churches are not telling us (maybe because they don't even know, since they mostly follow their man-made doctrines)?
What did the Greeks mean in their language at the time when using this phrase?
The Septuagint does not say "only begotten son." It says "beloved son." The Greek phrase "only begotten son" was an idiom of the time that meant "most beloved son" of all the sons a man might have.
It is more akin to "most favored son." It can also mean "one of a kind" or "unique."
In the Constitution, the 2nd Amendment says, "... right to bear arms." It does not mean your biceps. It means your pistol or rifle. Words can SEEM to mean one thing, but you have to look beyond the surface to find out which meaning really applies.
Personally, I think that Jesus Christ was God in human form, and not actually a "son" of God. But the writers of the New Testament did not understand it that way, probably because Christ Himself said he was the "son of God."
If He had come out and said He IS God, that would have been a different conversation, and would have made the message far more difficult to give to mortal humans.
But that is a side issue.
Really, John 3:16 must be understood within the CONTEXT of the ENTIRE Bible. It cannot be taken as a snippet, read as written in the English versions of the Bible, and used to claim it means what you are claiming it means.
The people who wrote the NT did not see planet Earth as the "world" in the way we do today, and did not see "people" of their society the same, either.
They only understood their "world" and society of their day.
And they wrote about it from THEIR perspective.
The rest of your post would take even longer to respond to, as you are using a number of terms that are also out-of-context ("Jew," "Gentile," and "nation" in particular), and I'm sure you got that from the denominational churches who have their doctrines that are made-up by men, and not necessarily taken from the Bible, as originally written.
Most Christians today have this same problem, and that's why nobody seems to understand the story of the Bible.
It has been purposely mistranslated and misunderstood -- over many centuries. That's what should be expected from the enemy, after all.
You are potentially misleading souls ...
I would say YOU are the one misleading by falling for a false understanding of the Bible, that the writers never intended.
Why didn't Paul write any epistles to the Zulus in Africa? Why didn't he write to the Mongolians in Asia?
Because they lived outside of the story of the Bible, and were never intended to be a part of Christian society.
Same exact concept when the Founding Fathers created the United States of America. It was written by and for the People, and THEIR Posterity.
Our modern understanding of both the Constitution and the Bible have been ... corrupted.
That should not shock anyone, since we all know what a corrupt society we find ourselves in.
What you’re teaching is not the gospel of Jesus Christ—it’s a distortion. The story of Scripture from beginning to end is God redeeming all nations, not just one bloodline.
God’s promise was global from the start.
• Genesis 12:3 — “All peoples on earth will be blessed through you.”
• Isaiah 49:6 — “I will make you a light for the Gentiles, that my salvation may reach to the ends of the earth.”
Jesus made the scope crystal clear.
• John 3:16 — “God so loved the world…”
• Matthew 28:19 — “Go and make disciples of all nations.”
• John 1:29 — “The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.”
The early church lived this out.
• Acts 2 — The Spirit poured out on “every nation under heaven.”
• Acts 10:34–35 — Peter: “God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation.”
• Galatians 3:28 — Paul: “There is neither Jew nor Gentile… you are all one in Christ.”
Twisting “world” into “only Israelites” is false.
Yes, kosmos has shades of meaning, but John is explicit:
• 1 John 2:2 — “He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.”
The end of the story leaves no doubt.
• Revelation 7:9 — “A great multitude… from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb.”
So let’s be clear:
• Jesus did not die for one race.
• Paul did not preach to one bloodline.
• The Spirit is not parceled out by genes it is received by consent and surrender
Your teaching is not hidden wisdom. It’s an old lie, recycled. The true gospel is open and plain: Christ crucified, arms stretched wide for the world. Anything smaller is not the gospel—it’s idolatry.
I stand by my “insult” because it is one or the other. If you are misled I beg you to seek Christ. Truly seek him go to him and ask that he guide you into all truth. If you are misusing the word for twisted purposes to deceive or to as a blade of your hate- then know you will be called to account. Your true motives will be made evident. Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. It is a blessing for those who seek truth and a curse to deceivers.
I agree. Islam is an underhanded scheme to take over the world by fraud, deceit, and violence, and NOT a true religion.
ANY group that denies the brotherhood of Man -- that opposes and actively violates Jesus' commandment to love one another -- is anti-life and a danger to civilized society.
Jesus is not the only religious leader to tell followers to love their fellow humans, of course. Other religions teach the same need for love and compassion -- and so does Islam -- but Islam negates that by ALSO teaching the need for Muslims to FORCE Islam on everyone else, including by force and violence.
You have a misunderstanding of what the Bible actually says about this.
Matthew 15:24 --
Jesus came ONLY for His people -- the Israelites (White people, not jews).
He did NOT come for anyone else.
When He said to love your neighbor, that word meant to love your fellow Israelites.
God commanded they KILL others -- those who would harm the Israelites.
The Bible DOES NOT say to love everyone.
The Bible is focused on God's people.
Notice, ALL of Paul's letters were written to his FELLOW Israelites in Europe, and NONE to anyone in Africa, China, or anywhere else.
You are either a liar or incredibly misled. I am gonna need you to produce receipts here are just some of mine- . Jesus Himself Testified to a Global Mission • John 3:16 – “For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life.” 👉 Not Israel alone — the world. • John 10:16 – “I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.” 👉 Jesus foresaw Gentiles (non-Israelites) being gathered to Him.
⸻
⸻
Aww ... are we gonna start with insults?
I could just tell you to go fuck yourself, but where would that get us?
Let's put the insults aside, and have a civil debate and discussion about what the Bible actually says, if possible.
Most Christians today have fallen into the trap of believing the DOCTRINES of the denominational churches and NOT the Bible itself.
MOST will simply listen to or read what a DOCTRINE says, and not actually try to read and understand the BIBLE ITSELF.
90% or more of the people attending church on Sunday really do not understand the Bible, and MOST of that is the fault of the preachers and their FALSE doctrines.
That's because the preachers do EXACTLY what you just did: take one little snippet from a verse of the Bible and claim it has a particular meaning, without ANY CONTEXT to validate it.
The churches have created THEIR OWN BIBLE(S), in a sense, via their doctrines, which in many cases are NOT accurate.
And yes, there are many false translations in our modern English versions of the Bible.
John 3:16 --
Many people want to point to this ONE verse in the Bible as the holy grail -- the ONE verse that TRUMPS all other biblical versus. But let's put it into perspective. It is only ONE verse, and it MUST be construed within the overall context of the ENTIRE Bible, not just this one passage standing alone to "prove" something.
To understand the Bible, we must consider how the people who wrote it lived and experienced the "world" at that time. Just like understanding the Constitution requires us to understand what the Founding Fathers meant, we need to understand the Greeks at the time the New Testament books were written.
The word "world" in English is translated from several Greek words. One of them means the Greco-Roman geographic territory that the people of that time understood as the "world."
They knew about the Middle East (as we call it today), because that is where they lived. They knew about north Africa and part of Europe and part of near Asia, but they did not know much beyond that, and did not know of any "people" beyond their immediate area.
The people living in this "world" that they knew were mostly White. The blacks were still in Africa, the Asians in far east Asia, etc.
As I said previously, Paul wrote ALL of his letters to his FELLOW Israelites (in Europe), and none to anyone else -- because they were not known to him, and were not a part of this new thing called Christianity.
Another Greek word that has been translated into "world" in English actually means something more close to "society." It is not a geographic term, but a social term.
This is "our world" or "our society." It's that kind of idea.
When it comes to the Constitution, the government was founded and organized by the White men of America. The Indians played no part and were outside the scope of "America" in the governmental sense.
Likewise, the blacks were mostly slaves, and the few blacks who were free also played no role. So, when the Preamble says, "... our Posterity," it is not talking about anyone who is not a part of "us" or "our."
The Bible was written by men who lived in a time and place where the White man lived in the "world," both in terms of the geographic territory and the society -- the "world" that they knew.
By the time of Jesus, there were also non-Whites there, such as Canaanites and Edomites (ancestors to modern-day Jews), but they looked more or less white, as well. There were no Africans, Chinese, etc. living where Jesus was.
This is why Jesus often spoke to the "multitudes." They were all the various people living in Judea, not just the Israelites who were still there.
"World" to them was the geographic territory AND society of the Israelites, for whom the Bible was written in the first place.
Remember, God promised that the Israelites would inherit the Earth -- ONLY the Israelites. The others were not a factor in the big picture story of the Bible, other than various mentions of how they interfered with the Israelites.
1 Kings 8:53 --
And later, Matthew 15:24 --
Jesus did not come to Earth for everyone. Said so himself.
The Israelites were the "world" that Christ came to save.
He came SPECIFICALLY to save the Israelites from sin by sacrificing Himself because The Law required DEATH for many sins, and the Israelites just could not live up to it. But The Law still REQUIRED the death penalty, so Jesus took the "bullet" for all Israelites, so that in the future their death penalty was already paid.
They were still not supposed to sin, but now any sin would be accounted for in Heaven, rather than the death penalty.
Matthew 5:17 & 19 --
That was His primary, though not only purpose.
The phrase "only begotten son" also needs to be examined. We are told elsewhere in the Bible that Adam is the "son of God," and that the children of Israel are the "children of God."
This seems to be another contradiction. Is "only begotten son" translated accurately in John 3:16?
In Hebrews 11:17, Isaac is called Abraham's "only begotten son," even though Ishmael was also Abraham's' son.
What gives? How can someone have an ONLY begotten son, when he has more than one son?
Does the phrase mean something the churches are not telling us (maybe because they don't even know, since they mostly follow their man-made doctrines)?
What did the Greeks mean in their language at the time when using this phrase?
The Septuagint does not say "only begotten son." It says "beloved son." The Greek phrase "only begotten son" was an idiom of the time that meant "most beloved son" of all the sons a man might have.
It is more akin to "most favored son." It can also mean "one of a kind" or "unique."
In the Constitution, the 2nd Amendment says, "... right to bear arms." It does not mean your biceps. It means your pistol or rifle. Words can SEEM to mean one thing, but you have to look beyond the surface to find out which meaning really applies.
Personally, I think that Jesus Christ was God in human form, and not actually a "son" of God. But the writers of the New Testament did not understand it that way, probably because Christ Himself said he was the "son of God."
If He had come out and said He IS God, that would have been a different conversation, and would have made the message far more difficult to give to mortal humans.
But that is a side issue.
Really, John 3:16 must be understood within the CONTEXT of the ENTIRE Bible. It cannot be taken as a snippet, read as written in the English versions of the Bible, and used to claim it means what you are claiming it means.
The people who wrote the NT did not see planet Earth as the "world" in the way we do today, and did not see "people" of their society the same, either.
They only understood their "world" and society of their day.
And they wrote about it from THEIR perspective.
The rest of your post would take even longer to respond to, as you are using a number of terms that are also out-of-context ("Jew," "Gentile," and "nation" in particular), and I'm sure you got that from the denominational churches who have their doctrines that are made-up by men, and not necessarily taken from the Bible, as originally written.
Most Christians today have this same problem, and that's why nobody seems to understand the story of the Bible.
It has been purposely mistranslated and misunderstood -- over many centuries. That's what should be expected from the enemy, after all.
I would say YOU are the one misleading by falling for a false understanding of the Bible, that the writers never intended.
Why didn't Paul write any epistles to the Zulus in Africa? Why didn't he write to the Mongolians in Asia?
Because they lived outside of the story of the Bible, and were never intended to be a part of Christian society.
Same exact concept when the Founding Fathers created the United States of America. It was written by and for the People, and THEIR Posterity.
Our modern understanding of both the Constitution and the Bible have been ... corrupted.
That should not shock anyone, since we all know what a corrupt society we find ourselves in.
What you’re teaching is not the gospel of Jesus Christ—it’s a distortion. The story of Scripture from beginning to end is God redeeming all nations, not just one bloodline.
God’s promise was global from the start. • Genesis 12:3 — “All peoples on earth will be blessed through you.” • Isaiah 49:6 — “I will make you a light for the Gentiles, that my salvation may reach to the ends of the earth.”
Jesus made the scope crystal clear. • John 3:16 — “God so loved the world…” • Matthew 28:19 — “Go and make disciples of all nations.” • John 1:29 — “The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world.”
The early church lived this out. • Acts 2 — The Spirit poured out on “every nation under heaven.” • Acts 10:34–35 — Peter: “God does not show favoritism but accepts from every nation.” • Galatians 3:28 — Paul: “There is neither Jew nor Gentile… you are all one in Christ.”
Twisting “world” into “only Israelites” is false. Yes, kosmos has shades of meaning, but John is explicit: • 1 John 2:2 — “He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world.”
The end of the story leaves no doubt. • Revelation 7:9 — “A great multitude… from every nation, tribe, people and language, standing before the throne and before the Lamb.”
So let’s be clear: • Jesus did not die for one race. • Paul did not preach to one bloodline. • The Spirit is not parceled out by genes it is received by consent and surrender
Your teaching is not hidden wisdom. It’s an old lie, recycled. The true gospel is open and plain: Christ crucified, arms stretched wide for the world. Anything smaller is not the gospel—it’s idolatry. I stand by my “insult” because it is one or the other. If you are misled I beg you to seek Christ. Truly seek him go to him and ask that he guide you into all truth. If you are misusing the word for twisted purposes to deceive or to as a blade of your hate- then know you will be called to account. Your true motives will be made evident. Ye shall know the truth and the truth shall set you free. It is a blessing for those who seek truth and a curse to deceivers.